Hello!
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > STOPPED_BY_WATCHPOINT () = 0
> > infrun: context switch
> > infrun: Switching context from bogus thread id 1 to Thread 25830.3
>
> ^^
>
> This
On Saturday 11 October 2008 18:26:11, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Doesn't resume the whole shell?
>
> But as I see things we always have ``non_stop == 0'' and thus
> ``resume_ptid = pid_to_ptid (-1)'', so that should be fine, isn't it?
>
Duh! Yes, of course.
> Here is a debugging-enabled run o
Hello again!
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 07:26:11PM +0200, I wrote:
> Unfortunately no luck so far. wait_for_inferior / handle_inferior_event
> (which was used in the old code) is too complex as to be quickly
> understandable for me. And I guess I'm estimating correctly that it's
> ``simply'' some s
Hello!
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Saturday 11 October 2008 00:27:06, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On HEAD, when undoing this change (and additionally commenting out the
> > two ``stop_soon = X'' lines in that file), things are fine again.
At the end of this em
