On Saturday 11 October 2008 18:26:11, Thomas Schwinge wrote:

> > Doesn't resume the whole shell?
> 
> But as I see things we always have ``non_stop == 0'' and thus
> ``resume_ptid = pid_to_ptid (-1)'', so that should be fine, isn't it?
> 

Duh!  Yes, of course.

> Here is a debugging-enabled run of a thusly patched GDB HEAD:

Thanks.

> 
>     STOPPED_BY_WATCHPOINT () = 0
>     infrun: context switch
>     infrun: Switching context from bogus thread id 1 to Thread 25830.3

              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This is missing in the new implementation.  In Hurd when going through
the shell doing fork/execs, we see new threads at every exec, and the
old threads disappear.  Could you try adding a `switch_to_thread 
(resume_thread)'
somewhere after target_wait returns and before any other target method?

-- 
Pedro Alves


Reply via email to