Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

Hello again! On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:21:52AM +0200, I wrote: > If you are building GNU Mach kernels from gnumach-1-branch, this means > that you a) can now get a usable GNU Mach kernel configuring it just like > `./configure' I should add that this will select those device drivers by default t

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

Hello! On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:37:50PM +0200, I wrote: > What are people's feelings about having all (working) device drivers > enabled by default when configuring GNU Mach? I just committed the following to gnumach-1-branch: #v+ 2006-09-20 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Dri

[bug #17808] NULL timeval does not return current date/time in futimes.c

URL: Summary: NULL timeval does not return current date/time in futimes.c Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: bddebian Submitted on: Tuesday 09/19/2006 at 18:07 Category: glibc

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only situations where this is _not_ what I'd expect from a kernel's > build system by default is when a) hunting bugs or b) building a large > number of kernels when testing specific issues (and you then only want to > compile the actually needed d

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:43:55AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: > How about we move all the drive into userspace? ;-) Send patches. Michael ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

How about we move all the drive into userspace? ;-) Barry ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:28:38PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Michael, Richard, Samuel: thanks for the quick input. I can understand > your concerns and would like to propose adding the following to the > configure options: > > #v+ > --disable-default-device-drivers >

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

Hello! On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:37:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > What are people's feelings about having all (working) device drivers > enabled by default when configuring GNU Mach? Michael, Richard, Samuel: thanks for the quick input. I can understand your concerns and would like to pr

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 14:37:50 +0200, a écrit : > What are people's feelings about having all (working) device drivers > enabled by default when configuring GNU Mach? That would avoid debian's --enable-this --enable-that ... configuration line :) That said, if I want to only enable

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:37:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > What are people's feelings about having all (working) device drivers > enabled by default when configuring GNU Mach? What would happen if a user configures with --enable-ide? Would that mean it only enables ide, or would it be a n

Re: GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:37:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > What are people's feelings about having all (working) device drivers > enabled by default when configuring GNU Mach? I don't like this idea at all :-/. When people build their own kernel, they usually know what they need. Building

GNU Mach: enabling all (working) device drivers by default?

Hello! What are people's feelings about having all (working) device drivers enabled by default when configuring GNU Mach? The only situations where this is _not_ what I'd expect from a kernel's build system by default is when a) hunting bugs or b) building a large number of kernels when testing s

Re: Locating mis-compilations (was: [bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1)

Hi, Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 12:47:35 +0200, a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:27:11AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > GCC gets smarter and smarter... When seeing this: > > > > [...] > > As there seems to be general interest: can you explain what techniques > and tools you use

Re: Announcing the slow burial of the Hurd Wiki

Hello! Sorry, still no real news, but... On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:04:34AM +0200, Marc Dequ??nes wrote: > Marc Dequ??nes (Duck) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thomas, anything decided yet ? Do you need an hosting place ? If so, > > DuckCorp could help in this area. I will get back to that i

Locating mis-compilations (was: [bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1)

Hello! On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:27:11AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > GCC gets smarter and smarter... When seeing this: > > [...] As there seems to be general interest: can you explain what techniques and tools you used to locate that problem? elfutils's elfcmp? objdump with shell script

ChangeLog entries (was: [patch] ISA-support in GNU Mach PCMCIA core)

Hello! On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:58:25AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:37:05PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > * i386/linux/configure: Regenerate. > > * i386/linux/device-drivers.h.in: Likewise. > > > > * i386/linux/configure.ac (AC_PCMCIA_OPTION): New fu