It's not a configure option. It's an ld option. AFAICT, no configuration
turns it on my default. Just use -shared -Wl,--enable-new-dtags.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
$B$^$?$3$&$$$&%a!<%k$b$i$$$^$7$?!##HM'C#$K$J$m$&!&!&!&$C$F!#(B
$B$d$C$Q$jN.9T$C$F$k$_$?$$$G$9$M!#(B
$BA0!9$+$i6=L#$O$"$C$?$s$G$9$1$I!"$J$+$J$+M&5$$,$G$J$/$C$F!#!#!#(B
$B$G$b:#2s$O;[EMAIL PROTECTED])@o$7$F$_$?$$$G$9!#(B
$B%o%j%+%s0lLk8B$j0&9%2q$NJ}$G$9$h$M!"$h$m$7$/$*4j$$$7$^$9!#(B
$Bhttp
$BBh(B18$B9f(B
$B"(A49q(B20$BL>MM8BDj4k2h(B
$B"(?7%5%$%H$OEPO?L5NA(B
$B$3$NEY$N?75,(BOPEN$B4k2h$G!"(B2$B;~4V0JFb$K(BPF$BEPO?$,$*:Q$_$NJ}$K8B$i$l$^$9$,!"([EMAIL
PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]"%I$b(B3$BL>J,IU2C$5$l$^$9(B(o^-')b
$B"([EMAIL PROTECTED]>5Z$S!"$4>[EMAIL PROTECTED
> Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> The most important part of the patch is setting up the route, for
> >> which no interface or utility exists.
> >
> > There is -g.
>
> Which sets the gateway, how would that help?
You said there was no existing facility for setting routes, which
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The most important part of the patch is setting up the route, for
>> which no interface or utility exists.
>
> There is -g.
Which sets the gateway, how would that help?
--
Marco
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
> Because without this patch, such things are not possible. Setting the
> address to 0.0.0.0 was not possible, but now it is.
Fine, so make that -a 0.0.0.0.
> The most important part of the patch is setting up the route, for
> which no interface or utility exists.
There is -g.
__
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 02:36:18PM -0400, Rian Hunter wrote:
> Like a lot of the GNU/Hurd user crowd I was faced with this same
> problem
> and also like a lot of the GNU/Hurd user crowd I just wrote my own.
Nice :)
> My translator setup is made for Debian and it has some sample boot
> scripts th
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 07:28:07PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Your patch is very useful of course, I just think we do not need an
> > explicit --dhcp function but rather should make -a 0.0.0.0 [...] work
> > equivalently (if this is not already the c
Like a lot of the GNU/Hurd user crowd I was faced with this same problem
and also like a lot of the GNU/Hurd user crowd I just wrote my own. My
translator setup is made for Debian and it has some sample boot scripts
tha start up egd and compile my translator. There is a readme file in
the archi
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > As the DHCP script sets things to 0.0.0.0 anyway, I am a bit puzzled why
>> > this has to be a user-visable option.
>>
>> Because withou
Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> Actually, being the stubborn hard-ass that I am I managed to build and
> successfully boot oskit-mach today. It's weird, but I've put up the
> resulting kernel, build scripts and modules file, free for testing at
Amazing :-)
> It just won't die! :-)
If we ignore oskit h
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 02:15:44PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Joachim Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, is there any way of making the patch a little bit more
> > generic? If anything, just to be able to remove the "dhcp"
> > connection that I think Roland was against.
> This me
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As the DHCP script sets things to 0.0.0.0 anyway, I am a bit puzzled why
> > this has to be a user-visable option.
>
> Because without this patch, such things are not possible. Settin
E' finalmente nato il primo portale di dating !!!
Entra a far parte della nostra community.
Migliaia di single ti aspettano!
Trova e conquista la tua anima gemella
oppure conosci nuovi amici e amiche!
Crea il tuo profilo, cerca tra foto e video
chatta con chi p
Title: Внимание
Aнглийский&немецкий&французский& итальянский& арабский&испанский&
китайский&японский&португальский&чешский&греческий&русский
языки. Групповые, частные, корпоративные
занятия c преподавателями из стран изучаемого языка! Уютные классы для занятий, а
также выезд в компании! Уро
Joachim Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to try it out but I'm still in the rebuilding phase of
> my "pick-up-the-hurd-hobby". However, is there any way of making
> the patch a little bit more generic? If anything, just to be able
> to remove the "dhcp" connection that I think Rola
Marco Gerards wrote:
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Can you please tell me if the patch is ok like it is now or if I
should change anything?
Does it actually work? I recall that I tried it (might have been a
older patch), and it didn't work for me.
It does for me. And if peopl
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:10:24AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>Can you please tell me if the patch is ok like it is now or if I
>should change anything?
>
> Does it actually work? I recall that I tried it (might have been a
> older patch), and it didn't work for me.
You need Marco's
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Can you please tell me if the patch is ok like it is now or if I
>should change anything?
>
> Does it actually work? I recall that I tried it (might have been a
> older patch), and it didn't work for me.
It does for me. And if people don't
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As the DHCP script sets things to 0.0.0.0 anyway, I am a bit puzzled why
> this has to be a user-visable option.
Because without this patch, such things are not possible. Setting the
address to 0.0.0.0 was not possible, but now it is.
The most importa
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:29:43AM +0200, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> > Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > Marco Gerards wrote:
> >> > What this patch does is preparing the state of the interfaces so
> >> > it can use 0.0.0.0 as address and broadcast.
> >> That has nothing to do wit
Can you please tell me if the patch is ok like it is now or if I
should change anything?
Does it actually work? I recall that I tried it (might have been a
older patch), and it didn't work for me.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http:
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Setting the addresses and the route to match them is indeed what it does,
> and that is not specific to DHCP just because that's the motivation for it.
Right. And I would like to see this patch applied soon. Can you
please tell me if the patch is ok
23 matches
Mail list logo
