Joachim Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to try it out but I'm still in the rebuilding phase of > my "pick-up-the-hurd-hobby". However, is there any way of making > the patch a little bit more generic? If anything, just to be able > to remove the "dhcp" connection that I think Roland was against.
This means doing things I don't want to do for this pfinet. For the new pfinet, I do not care about doing this at all. Anyway, why would we care too much about something that will be thrown away? It is not that bad either... > For example, automatic adding of zero route if IP is 0.0.0.0. So to > setup the iface for dhcp one would have to add call settrans with > ip=0.0.0.0 (to get routing setup), mast=0.0.0.0 and bcast to > 255.255.255.255. But that seems a bit redundant since it's only > dhcp clients that will use it. Perhaps. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
