Another fatfs patch

2003-07-15 Thread Marco Gerards
Hi, This patch fixes reading in fatfs. There were still some issues, especially when using big partitions created by MSDOS. (I found out about this thanks to Barry deFreese. He tested fatfs, the CVS version and the version with this patch applied). I removed a check in fat.c because some filesys

Bug#190732: [PATCH] hurd/libdiskfs/dir-renamed.c

2003-07-15 Thread Marco Gerards
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I think the first patch is basically correct, although I wonder about > the following details: > > 1. What errors do you still expect from the second time diskfs_lookup is > invoked with REMOVE? Is there any error that is allowed at that ti

Re: CVS error for GnuMach

2003-07-15 Thread Marco Gerards
"J. Buchanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone please fix the GnuMach CVS repository? > > cvs [checkout aborted]: could not chdir to gnumach/i386/aux: Invalid > argument IIRC "aux" is a special file name in windows (or something like that). IIRC there was a discussion about this on this

Bug#190732: [PATCH] hurd/libdiskfs/dir-renamed.c

2003-07-15 Thread Ognyan Kulev
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:43:24AM -0500, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > 1. What errors do you still expect from the second time diskfs_lookup is > invoked with REMOVE? Is there any error that is allowed at that time? > If there is, the change is correct. Before the second diskfs_lookup, mutex_unlock

Re: gnumach internals

2003-07-15 Thread brunoacf
> A good place to start is with the specifications for Mach 3 which GNU > Mach is based on [0]. > > [0] http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/mach/public/www/doc/osf.html, > The links for downloading the documents are a bit unstable so try > it once to thrice; if you still can't get it to wo

Re: Linux Poject

2003-07-15 Thread Robert Millan
Hi Prasanna, This is a collaborative open development project, please keep the CC to public list when discussing public issues. On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:47:45AM -0700, prasanna wakhare wrote: > Sir, > I have read the page ,perhaps it need some time to > read and understand the whole thing,But

Re: CVS error for GnuMach

2003-07-15 Thread James Morrison
> From: "J. Buchanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:09:56 +1000 > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.

Re: CVS error for GnuMach

2003-07-15 Thread Danilo Segan
уторак, 15. јул 2003. 08:09:56 CEST — J. Buchanan написа: I suppose it could have been cygwin. I followed the instructions on the Hurd website to checkout gnumach. Looks like I'll have to check out a copy on another machine running something other than Windows. :-) It's not cygwin, it's Windows'

Bug#190732: [PATCH] hurd/libdiskfs/dir-renamed.c

2003-07-15 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, I think the first patch is basically correct, although I wonder about the following details: 1. What errors do you still expect from the second time diskfs_lookup is invoked with REMOVE? Is there any error that is allowed at that time? If there is, the change is correct. 2. Is it possible,

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-07-15 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:24:50AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Small run down on what is fixed and what is not fixed in CVS, and what > has a patch attached. I'll see if I can comment about some of the > patches in more detail today (I'll probobly comment about them in a > reply to this mail)

Re: CVS error for GnuMach

2003-07-15 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:18:04PM +1000, J. Buchanan wrote: > Can someone please fix the GnuMach CVS repository? > > cvs [checkout aborted]: could not chdir to gnumach/i386/aux: Invalid > argument AUX is a special file name in the Windows operating system. Use a sane operating system instead :)

Re: Hurd ioctls.

2003-07-15 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:15:01PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > I'm trying to implement the SIOCADDRT ioctl for the Hurd. I've > encountered a problem in the Hurd/glibc while doing this. > > The format of an ioctl request "bits/ioctls.h" is defined. In this > request there are only 5 bits defined