On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 09:58:53AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >ufs-fsck is fsck for ufs, I belive that bsdfsck is the same thing only
> >rewritten.
> >
> > I mean the other way of course, ufs-fsck is a rewritten version of
> > b
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 09:58:06AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Also, is there a reason to keep bsdfsck, defpager and libtreefs
> > around? About libtreefs I'm a bit unsure, since it might be useful.
> > But I doubt this since it hasn't been touched since 1996 (there is not
> > even a C
Why do you want to delete things like this?
Because I feel like it.
They are in-progress, it's in the CVS source, which is the right
place for things like that. Of course they are not in the release,
but that's a separate question.
Am I wrong to say that libtreefs is obsolete, dead
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>ufs-fsck is fsck for ufs, I belive that bsdfsck is the same thing only
>rewritten.
>
> I mean the other way of course, ufs-fsck is a rewritten version of
> bsdfsck. Please correct me if this _not_ the case.
You are correct. bsdfsck is the
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, is there a reason to keep bsdfsck, defpager and libtreefs
> around? About libtreefs I'm a bit unsure, since it might be useful.
> But I doubt this since it hasn't been touched since 1996 (there is not
> even a ChangeLog).
Why do you want to
New Reference Books
for the International Academic
Community
The Grants Register 2003
is the most authoritative and comprehensive guide available to
postgraduate grants and professional funding worldwide. For over twenty
years The Grants Regi
ufs-fsck is fsck for ufs, I belive that bsdfsck is the same thing only
rewritten.
I mean the other way of course, ufs-fsck is a rewritten version of
bsdfsck. Please correct me if this _not_ the case.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
Is bsdfsck just fsck for ufs? If yes, it should probably be renamed for
consistency.
ufs-fsck is fsck for ufs, I belive that bsdfsck is the same thing only
rewritten.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listin
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 03:50, M. Gerards wrote:
> > Also, is there a reason to keep bsdfsck, defpager and libtreefs
> > around? About libtreefs I'm a bit unsure, since it might be useful.
> > But I doubt this since it hasn't been touched since 1996 (there is not
> > even a ChangeLog).
Is bsdfsck j
Title: :: ¸Þ°¡Æнº °í°´ °¨»ç ´ëÃàÁ¦ ::
> Package: hurd
> Version: 20021118-1
> Severity: minor
>
> With the newest hurd package, using Alt-Fx to access virtual consoles
> works only for the first two consoles. The rest can only be accessed
> with Alt-Left|Right.
This bug has been fixed in CVS on 2002-11-21. The bug was in pc-kbd.c. J
Why do you want to remove bsdfsck?
bsdfsck is duplicate code of ufs-fsck AFAICS.
Can someone please explain what libtreefs does, why it exists and
what is missing? I think most people (including me) don't have an
idea.
It is (was) a library for tree structured translators, it exists
> Also, is there a reason to keep bsdfsck, defpager and libtreefs
> around? About libtreefs I'm a bit unsure, since it might be useful.
> But I doubt this since it hasn't been touched since 1996 (there is not
> even a ChangeLog).
Why do you want to remove bsdfsck? I think it will be used more oft
13 matches
Mail list logo
