> > >* mux.c (lookup_host): removed arbitrary limit on host name
> > >size.
> >
> > Consider using realloc instead of a free followed by a malloc.
>
> I'm not so sure. realloc would involve copying the existing data,
> while free & malloc would not.
Yes, that is a valid point.
___
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:43:46PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> > * mux.c (lookup_host): removed arbitrary limit on host name
> > size.
>
> Consider using realloc instead of a free followed by a malloc.
I'm not so sure. realloc would involve copying the existing data,
while free &
--- Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Guess what? It's time for my weekly patch ;) This stuff is
> mostly
> > out of the glibc manual ;)
> >
> > 2002-03-03 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * mux.c (lookup_host): removed arbitrary limit on host
¸ÕÀú
Çã¶ô ¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»¼ ´ë´ÜÈ÷ ÁË¼Û ÇÕ´Ï´Ù
¾È³çÇϽʴϱî?
À¯¿£ºñÁ¾ÇÕ±ÝÀ¶
Àü¹®È¸»çÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
À¯¿£ºñÁ¾ÇÕ±ÝÀ¶Àº
»óÈ£½Å¿ë±Ý°í ´ëÃâ ´ëÇà»çÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÀúÈñ´Â
´Ù¸¥ ¾÷ü¿Í ´Þ¸® ¼ö¼ö·á¸¦ ÀüÇô ¹ÞÁö ¾Ê´Â ±ú²ýÇÑ ¾÷üÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
Ä«µå»ç¿ëÀÚ, Á÷ÀåÀÎ, ÁÖºÎ, ´ëÇлý, ÀÚ¿µ¾÷ÀÚ.
¶Ç
º¸ÇèÀ̳ª, Àû±ÝÀ» 3°³¿ùÀÌ»ó ³³À
> Hey,
>
> Guess what? It's time for my weekly patch ;) This stuff is mostly
> out of the glibc manual ;)
>
> 2002-03-03 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>* mux.c (lookup_host): removed arbitrary limit on host name
>size.
This is a good start.
Perhaps we should h
Hey,
Guess what? It's time for my weekly patch ;) This stuff is mostly
out of the glibc manual ;)
2002-03-03 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* mux.c (lookup_host): removed arbitrary limit on host name size.
Index: mux.c
Hi,
some functions within oskit-mach:./oskit (ds_notify, ds_device_write,
ds_device_write_inband, ds_device_read, ds_device_read_inband,
ds_asyncio_ready, ds_osenv_init, ds_request_init, ds_netdev_open) are
used implicitely in sources within oskit-mach/oskit. One could perhaps
provide a file name
This will remove unused variables within oskit-mach:./oskit:
2002-03-03 Michael Teichgraeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* oskit/ds_asyncio.c (new_request): Removed unused variable(s).
(ds_asyncio_complete_write_inband_1): Likewise.
(ds_asyncio_write_inband): Likewise.
Oskit-mach/oskit/ds_asynchio.c lacked definitions of
ds_device_.*error_reply and ds_device_.*reply_inband functions. This
can be fixed by including mig-generated headers device_reply.h and
device_error_reply.h. But, both of them had the same `#ifndef
_device_reply_user_' phrase at the beginning, s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes:
> Earlier, it was proposed to have stderr of the root filesystem be
> directed to he console. Thomas argued that was a really bad idea, and
> he's probably right. But I still think it would be desirable to use
> stderr for diagnostic messages from translat
Jon Arney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I said, I am not opposed to using syslogd and think starting there
> is a good idea. If you believe it is feasible without causing
> recursive RPC calls, I'll believe you. My only concern was that
> if, say, 'pfinet' needed to log something and syslog
Jon Arney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is not inherently better than syslogd. It does, however,
> serve a slightly different class of process.
We don't really want to have "different classes" of processes unless
there's a real need.
> The second point is that many of the hurd translators
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I think would be pretty cool: let the logging function use
> /servers/log (or whatever) if the server is running as root and
> ~/servers/log (or whatever) otherwise.
I think that's a fine idea.
___
Bug
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 05:28:45PM -0700, Jon Arney wrote:
> > You'll have to make sure those pathes are clean.
>
> Or that the likelihood of following an unclean path is vanishingly
> small.
I would say that if you recognize a situation that would make all further
writes (to a file, to a socke
>
> If sending something over a socket causes the socket server to log a
> message, then you have a serious problem anyway.
>
> The same problem exists in a more minimal model: If writing something to a
> file causes the filesystem server to log a message, then you are in big
> trouble.
I agre
The bug is triggered, when from an underlying layer (driver layer, I think)
an error via the return value is reported. I tried several values for the
size parameter. If it's reasonable large, for example 64 bytes, the system
stays stable. But count = 4 will trigger the bug. To be on sure side I t
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:42:16PM -0700, Jon Arney wrote:
> As I said, I am not opposed to using syslogd and think starting there
> is a good idea. If you believe it is feasible without causing
> recursive RPC calls, I'll believe you. My only concern was that
> if, say, 'pfinet' needed to log s
Title: ¼¥º¸ÀÌ Á¤º¸ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¢¾
´Ô¿¡°Ô ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀ»
º¸³»µµ µÉ±î¿ä. ¢¾
µü Çѹø¸¸ º¸³¾²²¿ä. ^*^
ÀþÀº ³×ƼÁ𳢸® ¾à¼Ó µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
(Àú¿¡ ȨÇÇ¿¡¼± (¸ð),(¾Æ),(¸à) À̶ó°í ºÒ·¯¿ä)
ÀúÈñ´Â °ñ,¶ó,õ,¿ø GOLLA1000WON.COM
Áß°íÀÇ·ù,½Å»óÇ° Àü¹®Á¡
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.°¡°ÝÀÌ ½Î¹Ç·Î ÁÁÀº Á¤º¸¶ó »ý°¢
Jon Arney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the risk of beating a dead horse and annoying you all
> terribly much, I would like to submit some of my thinking
> on a Hurd logging facility. Feel free to tear this to
> shreads, but I think the discussion should be started
> and work begun on a solut
19 matches
Mail list logo
