Title: ÃÖ½ÅÇü ÇÚµåÆùÀ» °¡Àå½Î°Ô! ¿ä±Ýµµ °¡Àå½Î°Ô!
ÃÖ½ÅÇü ÇÚµåÆùÀ» 38%½Î°Ô!! ¿ä±Ýµµ 20%½Î°Ô!!Áö±Ý±îÁö ÀÌ·± °÷Àº
¾ø¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.Àú·ÅÇÑ °¡°Ý¿¡ ¸¸Á·ÇÏ½Ç °Ì´Ï´Ù.Á÷Á¢È®ÀÎÇϼ¼¿ä.ȨÆäÀÌÁö·Î °¡±â
º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å,Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶õÀÌ Ç¥½ÃµÈ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»µå·Á Á˼ÛÇϸç,
Title: ±ÝÀϼöÇù¼ö»ê ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏ.
¿Ïµµ ±ÝÀϼö»ê¾÷Çùµ¿Á¶ÇÕ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀúÈñ Á¶ÇÕ¿¡¼´Â Á¶ÇÕÀÇ ÀÚ»ç
±ÝÀϼöÇù¼ö»êÀ» °æ¿µ, ¿î¿µÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀúÈñ Á¶ÇÕÀº ûÁ¤ÇØ¿ª ¿Ïµµ¿¡¼ ³ª¿À´Â ¸ðµç ¼ö»ê¹°, ƯÈ÷
´Ù½Ã¸¶ ¸¦ °¡Áö°í ¿©·¯°¡Áö »óÇ°È Çϴµ¥ ¼º°øÇÏ¿©
Àü±¹¿¡ À¯Åë°ú ¼¼°è ¿©·¯³ª¶ó¿¡ ÀÚ¶
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:45:21PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I haven't considered alternatives, like suspending threads. I am not sure
> > if that would work. I guess that if you do it within the I/O bitmap lock,
> > it could be safe
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't considered alternatives, like suspending threads. I am not sure
> if that would work. I guess that if you do it within the I/O bitmap lock,
> it could be safe, although it seems to me that it is potentially much
> slower than the other ap
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:30:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Design flaw: Changes don't propagate immediately to other threads in
> > the same task running on another processor. This applies to enable as
> > well as disable operations
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Design flaw: Changes don't propagate immediately to other threads in
> the same task running on another processor. This applies to enable as
> well as disable operations! Espen Skoglund pointed out that we only
> need to propagate disable operation
Hi,
here is the latest version of the patch. It should actually be quite
close to a final version. Roland, if there is anything I haven't
addressed please let me know. I have tested it for functionality,
but I have not done stress testing (we will certainly get to that).
Design flaw: Changes
A lot of warnings are caused by constructs within oskit-20010214
headers, such as
o multi-line string literals (in about 8 files):
|asm volatile("
| jmp 0f
| 0:
| ") .
This should be the same and fixes it
Hi,
libstore uses device_map with size and offset being null. This triggers
INVALSZ in ds_mem_map (I think the third check fails, because
trunc_page (offset + size - 1) underflows.
I am not sure if oskit-mach should allow such bogus mappings, or libstore
should try harder to provide proper val
Title: ±ÝÀϼöÇù¼ö»ê ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏ.
¿Ïµµ ±ÝÀϼö»ê¾÷Çùµ¿Á¶ÇÕ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀúÈñ Á¶ÇÕ¿¡¼´Â Á¶ÇÕÀÇ ÀÚ»ç
±ÝÀϼöÇù¼ö»êÀ» °æ¿µ, ¿î¿µÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀúÈñ Á¶ÇÕÀº ûÁ¤ÇØ¿ª ¿Ïµµ¿¡¼ ³ª¿À´Â ¸ðµç ¼ö»ê¹°, ƯÈ÷
´Ù½Ã¸¶ ¸¦ °¡Áö°í ¿©·¯°¡Áö »óÇ°È Çϴµ¥ ¼º°øÇÏ¿©
Àü±¹¿¡ À¯Åë°ú ¼¼°è ¿©·¯³ª¶ó¿¡ ÀÚ¶
Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And after you can start with the Hurd, there are a lot of warning if
> you use gcc 3 (some of them aren't fixable, because MiG doesn't know
> about a constant string for example).
Yes, that is fixable, because we can fix MiG.
___
Title: Aristotle
Golf...
It's More Than a Game...Roy
B. Evans, CAE tells you about his favorite courses. Click here
for his choices!
From
the
Publisher of PMI
The
Key
to the Religious
Travel
Mark
I just took out the low-hanging fruit.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Is there any remote chance that we could convert oskit-mach to follow
the GNU Coding Standard?
--
Alfred M. Szmidt
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
* Marcus Brinkmann writes:
> That really needs to be cleaned up, by going carefully through the
> files and checking what needs to be included where. It seems to me
> that a lot of cleanup could be done, too. For example, the ipc code
> uses printf, and most files define printf to kdbprintf at t
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 06:21:36AM -0500, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:51:27AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> > Perfect, you just gave me something "fun" to do. :-)
> >
> > I can do the -Wall cleanup over the weekend. Unless of course someone
> > else wants to do it.
>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:51:27AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Perfect, you just gave me something "fun" to do. :-)
>
> I can do the -Wall cleanup over the weekend. Unless of course someone
> else wants to do it.
Michael Teichgraeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> also volunteered. I suggest you
shar
Hi
I visited EEDOC.MYSCAN.ORG, and
noticed that you're not listed on some search engines! I think we can offer
you a service which can help you increase traffic and the number of visitors
to your website.
I would like to introduce you to Traffi
Hi,
Perfect, you just gave me something "fun" to do. :-)
I can do the -Wall cleanup over the weekend. Unless of course someone
else wants to do it.
--
Alfred M. Szmidt
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
19 matches
Mail list logo
