Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Design flaw: Changes don't propagate immediately to other threads in > the same task running on another processor. This applies to enable as > well as disable operations! Espen Skoglund pointed out that we only > need to propagate disable operations, enable operations could be picked > up in the fault handler (for extra performance).
Why is this so? Why not just suspend the threads around the operation and then resume them (forcing them to reload processor state)? _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
