ÄÄÇ»Å͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇϽôµ¥ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥À»
¾öû Àú·ÅÇÑ °¡°Ý¿¡ ÆË´Ï´Ù
ÃÖ½ÅÇ®¹öÀü°ÔÀÓ. ÄÄÇ»ÅÍÀ¯Æ¿ÇÁ·Î±×·¥. ¼ºÀνõð µîµî
¾ø´Â°Ô ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù
¹°·Ð ½Å¿ëÀº ±âº»ÀÔ´Ï´Ù
ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³½ ¾ÆÀ̵ð·Î´Â ¿¬¶ôÀÌ µÇÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
¾ÐÃàÈÀϼӿ¡ ¿¬¶ôó°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù(¸ÞÀÏ.ÀüȹøÈ£)
ÇÚµåÆùÀ¸·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽʽÿä
³¡À¸·Î Çã¶
Hi!
INSTALL file which comes with gnumach cvs sources says:
Some systems require unusual options for compilation or linking that
the `configure' script does not know about. You can give `configure'
initial values for variables by setting them in the environment. Using
a Bourne-compatible s
Title: :+: ÇѺ£ÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏ :+:
+
Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã¸é ¹Ù·Î ÀúÈñ ÀÚ·á¿¡¼ ±ÍÇÏÀÇ À̸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò°¡
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 08:39:14PM +0100, Diego Roversi wrote:
> Have you take a look to SuperVGATextMode?
Yes, I know it (and use it actually). However, as the name suggests, it
uses SVGA. SGVA is different from card to card, and I will not burden
myself with that. I think I have all the info
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:38:30PM +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Esp with the input below, I feel much better about Unicode now (although
> > I would not like to support the whole lot of it right from the
> > start, esp the compose characters A +
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 04:12:32PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I thought there might be problems because the UTF-8 encoding is multi-byte.
> > I don't see a problem with transfering UTF-8 data through our system (that's
> > what UTF-8 is about), but I thought term and maybe other things need
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 09:35:30PM +0100, Damien Genet wrote:
> how can i make oskit-mach, not to reboot after an error message ? so i
> can see what happenned
OSKit-Mach used to show a dump and wait for the user when it
crashed. I think this was when I used earlier versions of the OSKit
and that
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:42:18PM +0100, Niklas Höglund wrote:
> I think there is a program for the Linux console that does this. I
> remember seing this a while ago. I did a quick search in apt-cache,
> and found dynafont. I'm not sure if this is the program I remember,
> though. I couldn't find
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:33:10PM -0800, Galchin Vasili wrote:
>What has happened to the bug archives? Year 2024?
It's just spam sent with a bogus date. They probably want to be sure
you already have spam in 2024. I've heard that GNU is considering some
newer spam filtering software (they al
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on
Thursday, February 21, 19102 at 06:27:14
---
:: http://rd.yahoo.com/dir/?http://cumageddon.com/?r=pinklaces
---
Title: Ë÷ÎÄÍøÕ¾ Soven Website
»¶Ó½øÈ롶Ë÷ÎÄÍøÕ¾¡·
±±¾©Ë÷ÎÄ·ÒëÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
¡¡Ë÷ÎÄÍøÂçÓªÏú·þÎñÖÐÐÄ
Sove
* [Galchin Vasili]
> Hello,
>
>What has happened to the bug archives? Year 2024?
The reason for this is that mailman archives mails under the date
specified in the Date: header. If you sent a mail with a faked Date of,
say, some time in 2048, it would end up in that year. (but please don'
12 matches
Mail list logo
