bug#25752: go incremental builds broken

Hi Go team, I was reviewing the status of old bugs and I find bug#25752 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/25752 Since I am not a Go user, is it possible that Go team says if this bug is still worth keeping open? On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 10:22, zimoun wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 12:21, Ma

bug#39677: Evolution's inbox widget is blank

Hi, It is about this old bug#39677 [1]. Sorry for not noticing it before. 1: On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 17:53, zimoun wrote: > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 15:20, raingloom wrote: > >> I've been haunted by this for months, so it's high time I make a proper bug

bug#26247: Gettext introduces timestamps in .mo files

Hi, It is about this old bug#26247: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/26247 On Sat, 08 Oct 2022 at 16:25, zimoun wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 14:26, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas > wrote: > >> This bug has already been reported upstream[1] and probably I'll push it >> as soon as I have mor

bug#39738: ffmpeg-4.2.2 fails to build on native i686-linux

Hi, It is about the old bug#39738 [1]. 1: On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 17:50, zimoun wrote: > On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 at 23:53, Maxim Cournoyer > wrote: > >>> Building it on 64 bit hardware (much faster!) works for me, i.e. this >>> >>> guix build --system=

bug#30608: Aseba: thymiovpl is missing icons, asebaplayground is missing .playground examples

Hi, It is about this old bug#30608: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/30608 On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 at 22:50, Björn Höfling wrote: > The program thymiovpl of package aseba is missing icons: Now, years later and using Guix 6113e05, there is no program thymiovpl provided by the package aseba.

bug#66533: texmaker missing runtime dependency on gtk+

Hi, On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:18, Josh Marshall wrote: > When running texmaker and the user clicks the icon to open a file, if > the gtk+ package is missing it fails and crashes. I forgot the exact > error, but it just fails to retrieve a gtk object or something. Are you running on the top of

bug#66537: configure: error: The Guile bindings of GnuTLS are missing

Hi Hiep, > Hi, > > I'm on Fedora and started a shell with: > > ``` > guix shell -D guix help2man git strace --pure > ``` > > And then: > > ``` > ./bootstrap > ./configure --localstatedir=/var > ``` > > And it showed me this error: > > ``` > [snip] > checking for guile-3.0 >= 3.0.3... yes > checkin

bug#65177: udevd error with lvm-raid array leading to race condition with luks

Hi, On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 at 09:35, Simon Tournier wrote: >> All I can say is that the VMs now boot. > > WDYT about this patch? For easing the discussion, I extracted Yann’s diff and prepared a patch ready to merge. See: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/66586 Cheers, simon

bug#26247: Gettext introduces timestamps in .mo files

It's interesting to see that only the generate po files are compiled to non-reproducible mo files. All other translations seem fine, right? Could it be related to the way these po files are created? It might introduce a timestamp at that point, but I can't check right now. Le 17 octobre 2023 01

bug#66461: [PATCH] guix: import: opam: Handle list of licenses.

Hi Josselin, Cool, thank you for the quick fix. On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 at 11:39, Josselin Poiret wrote: > * guix/import/opam.scm (opam->guix-package): Handle lists of licenses. > --- > guix/import/opam.scm | 6 -- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) LGTM. Pushed and closing.

bug#66537: configure: error: The Guile bindings of GnuTLS are missing

Hi Daniel, On 10/17/23 10:59, Daniel Meißner wrote: > Hi Hiep, > >> Hi, >> >> I'm on Fedora and started a shell with: >> >> ``` >> guix shell -D guix help2man git strace --pure >> ``` >> >> And then: >> >> ``` >> ./bootstrap >> ./configure --localstatedir=/var >> ``` >> >> And it showed me this e

bug#39738: ffmpeg-4.2.2 fails to build on native i686-linux

Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: [...] >> Is ffmpeg still an issue an real 32 bits hardware? > > I do not have real 32 bits hardware to test on, but > > guix build --system=i686-linux ffmpeg > > works for me with Guix 6113e05. It outputs: > > /gnu/store/wprpm76xy3b0312579dgv0akzy6k9llh-ffm

bug#65924: [PATCH core-updates 3/3] gnu: git-minimal: Add coreutils and sed to PATH.

Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> Fixes . >> >> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git-minimal) >> [arguments] : New field. >> : Augment with (ice-9 match), (ice-9 textual-ports) and (guix >> search-paths). >> : Add patch-com

bug#66553: bug#66576: Request for merging "rust-team" branch

Hi Efraim, Efraim Flashner writes: > IMO rust-team branch is ready to merge. We've updated rust to 1.70, > librsvg to 2.56.4 and many new and updated packages. We've added a phase > to the cargo-build-system to fail if it detects pre-built files and > we've set the cargo-build-system to skip the

bug#65979: incorrect “guix hash” for FastQC

Hi Ludo, On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 at 15:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > My take is that it’s OK to keep ‘vcs-file?’ as is: the best we could do > would be to add complicated heuristics in the hope corner cases like > this one would be better dealt with, but it wouldn’t be bullet-proof > anyway. Hum, I

bug#66553: bug#66576: Request for merging "rust-team" branch

Hello! Efraim Flashner skribis: > IMO rust-team branch is ready to merge. We've updated rust to 1.70, > librsvg to 2.56.4 and many new and updated packages. We've added a phase > to the cargo-build-system to fail if it detects pre-built files and > we've set the cargo-build-system to skip the te

bug#66600: Bug report, as requested

This is from an Ubuntu installation running in a Parallels VM on a Mac with an M1 processor. ./guix/store.scm:1417:15: In procedure loop: ERROR: 1. &store-protocol-error: message: "build of `/gnu/store/sh67jclf7cxgzj4zh1ji14a193p9h8gp-guile-3.0.9.drv' failed" status: 100 /guix pul