bug#58923: Malformed core dumps on Guix System

Hi, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > mathieu@meije ~/tmp [env]$ gdb ./a.out /tmp/my-core-5622 > ... > BFD: warning: /tmp/my-core-5622 has a segment extending past end of file > ... > Failed to read a valid object file image from memory. I never encountered that issue, although I’ve had to look a lot

bug#58733: installer: coredump generation

Hi, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: >>From f4d2a1bb4df2f65b650be704bffb7ea469ae0232 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Mathieu Othacehe > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:03:46 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] installer: Add core dump support. > > Fixes: > > * gnu/installer.scm

bug#58732: installer: finalizers & device destroy segfault

Hi, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > null! I guess this has to deal with device pointer finalizers. I'm a bit > disappointed because I thought we had overcome those mistakes. There are several things we should audit in Guile-Parted regarding object lifecycles. Common issues when writing bindings th

bug#58923: Malformed core dumps on Guix System

Hey, > Could it have to do with /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern or with the fact > that your /tmp file system was full or something? What if you try to > have the core dump on another file system? I suspected that at first, but I then reproduced it on Berlin so I would rather bet on a recent reg

bug#58908: Position of '--check' makes or breaks 'guix shell'

Hi, On dim., 30 oct. 2022 at 14:57, Felix Lechner via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > For the Guix file below, which is also available here [1], the > position of the --check makes or breaks the command. > > With > > guix shell --development --check --file=guix.scm > > $ which autopoint >

bug#58802: On guix pull: failed to compute the derivation for Guix (ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:)

Hi, On lun., 31 oct. 2022 at 23:32, Wiktor Żelazny wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:04:43AM +0200, zimoun wrote: > >> Using Guix 00ff6f7 and running, >> >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> $ guix time-machine --commit=86ec52f66735b122b9035eba56516fd16f3be958

bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

Hi Vagrant, On ven., 28 oct. 2022 at 13:23, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> Oh yeah, that reminds me to add to the confusion, "guix time-machine >> --commit=SOMECOMMIT" worked fine, even where "SOMECOMMIT" didn't >> successfully work with guix pull. >> >> Maybe that's a clue pointing to the crufty .

bug#58900: guix pull failure

Hi, Thanks for you report. On dim., 30 oct. 2022 at 14:01, ya...@free.fr wrote: > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at > 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... > Building from this channel: > guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 9eabe0e This commit is from Oct

bug#58859: profile contents depends on package order

Hi, On sam., 29 oct. 2022 at 20:47, Attila Lendvai wrote: > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50878 It appears also related to: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43585 Cheers, simon

bug#58861: guix shell emulate-fhs option can have wrong glibc package

Hi, On sam., 29 oct. 2022 at 05:31, John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > ❯ guix shell -CFD hello coreutils > ❯ guix shell -CD hello -F coreutils > --8<---cut here---end--->8--

bug#58923: Malformed core dumps on Guix System

Hi, On mer., 02 nov. 2022 at 12:25, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: >I'll see if this can be reproduced on > a foreign distribution. Using Guix 00ff6f7. --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ uname -a Linux pfiuh07 5.13.0-40-generic #45~

bug#58760: Guix System iso too big for cdrom again

close 58760 thanks Thank you all for your responses. But I have closed the issue (without really trying the methods) because Tobias writes: > But we can go deeper if we choose to, by dropping zisofs and going for > something like squashfs, which achieves higher compression through > higher block

bug#58861: guix shell emulate-fhs option can have wrong glibc package

Hi simon and Ludo’, Before I forget, nckx helpfully pointed out that I linked to the wrong commit, which made this all the more confusing. The correct commit is On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 01:47 PM, zim

bug#58861: guix shell emulate-fhs option can have wrong glibc package

Hi John, John Kehayias skribis: > After commit > > I noticed a changed in behavior of guix shell with the emulate-fhs option > for a container. I tracked it down to the wrong glibc package appeari

bug#58733: installer: coredump generation

Hey, > Both look reasonable to me, thanks! Thanks for reviewing :) > Now, we should probably focus on Guile-Parted… Yes, I saw you sent a few pointers, that will be my next focus! Mathieu

bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

On 2022-11-02, zimoun wrote: > On ven., 28 oct. 2022 at 13:23, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >>> Oh yeah, that reminds me to add to the confusion, "guix time-machine >>> --commit=SOMECOMMIT" worked fine, even where "SOMECOMMIT" didn't >>> successfully work with guix pull. >>> >>> Maybe that's a clue