bug#51787: Disk performance on ci.guix.gnu.org

2021-12-26 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hello Ricardo, > Should we attempt to overwrite /gnu/store and rely exclusively on > substitutes from the cache? Yes, I don't see any other options. Before that, what might be nice could be: 1. Ensure that all Berlin /var/cache/guix/publish directory is synchronized on Bordeaux. We are now at

bug#52791: nextcloud-client not building on master

2021-12-26 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello Nicholas, Nicholas von Klitzing writes: > Updating the package to 3.2.0 (the version where the PR was merged) solves > the issue. This patch is attached. > > I'll see if I get to updating it to 3.4.1 > * gnu/packages/sync.scm (nextcloud-client): Update to 3.2.0. > --- > gnu/packages/sync

bug#52801: Bug report

2021-12-26 Thread Grigory Shepelev
Today's guix pull gives the following bug. shegeley@zone51 ~$ guix pull Updating channel 'nonguix' from Git repository at 'https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix'... Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Building from these channels: guix

bug#52801: Guile inconsistently misbehaves in case of escapes and carriage returns, breaking "guix pull"

2021-12-26 Thread Maxime Devos
retitle 52801 Guile inconsistently misbehaves in case of escapes and carriage returns, breaking "guix pull" severity 52801 important thanks Grigory Shepelev schreef op zo 26-12-2021 om 13:14 [+0300]: Today's guix pull gives the following bug. Seems like an instance of

bug#52797: texlive broken install

2021-12-26 Thread Michael Zappa
Thanks for the hint Tobias, I am currently on a foreign installation of Guix after some time on Guix System, and did not appreciate that guix-daemon ran off of the root user's guix. Simply running `guix pull` as root and restarting the daemon fixed this issue. I see Jéŕemy posted in the 'help' ma

bug#52797: texlive broken install

2021-12-26 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Michael, Michael Zappa 写道: I am currently on a foreign installation of Guix after some time on Guix System, and did not appreciate that guix-daemon ran off of the root user's guix. Simply running `guix pull` as root and restarting the daemon fixed this issue. \o/ I see Jéŕemy posted in the

bug#52807: Guix home executables are not executable

2021-12-26 Thread Nick Zalutskiy
I'd like to use `guix home` to symlink an executable into my home directory. Following simple configuration stored at `~/.dotfiles/home-configuration.scm` > (use-modules > (gnu home) > (gnu packages) > (gnu home services) > (gnu services) > (guix gexp) > (gnu home services shells)) >

bug#52808: Guix home should not assume that all targets are dot files

2021-12-26 Thread Nick Zalutskiy
The following configuration results in a `~/.run` symlink being created. My expectation is that a `~/run` symlink is created instead. (ie. not a dotfile) > (home-environment > (services > (list (service > home-bash-service-type > (home-bash-configuration >

bug#52807: Guix home executables are not executable

2021-12-26 Thread Aleksandr Vityazev
Hi, On 2021-12-26, 12:03 -0500, "Nick Zalutskiy" wrote: > I'd like to use `guix home` to symlink an executable into my home > directory. > > Following simple configuration stored at > `~/.dotfiles/home-configuration.scm` > > (use-modules >(gnu home) >

bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated

2021-12-26 Thread Jacob First
Thanks for the explanation. This rationale sounds reasonable to me. If someone with proper permission has modified a user account's comment, it could be important to preserve that customization. As I pointed out in an earlier message, I believe this behavior contradicts the documentation of the `u

bug#52807: Guix home executables are not executable

2021-12-26 Thread Nick Zalutskiy
Indeed I missed this in the manual. Thank you! I was trying to figure out how to close this... no luck. -Nick On Sun, Dec 26, 2021, at 4:44 PM, Aleksandr Vityazev wrote: > Hi, > > On 2021-12-26, 12:03 -0500, "Nick Zalutskiy" wrote: > >> I'd like to use `guix home` to symlink an executable

bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption

2021-12-26 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:36:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > > 2.2.32. >

bug#50433: shotcut 21.06.29 missing bin files

2021-12-26 Thread Vinicius Monego
Fixed in bc74c191df789ff200da6f81c3cf599eae39ca8e. Closing.