On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:36:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > > 2.2.32. > > I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. > There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, > I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 > variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's > no longer useful.
I pushed commit d03aa942d, which makes GnuPG 2.2.32 available in the UI. I didn't remove emacs-pinentry... that's something that Emacs users should decide how to handle.
