Hi,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 21:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Janneke 写道：
> > https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20190406T212022Z/pool/main/h/harfbuzz/harfbuzz_2.4.0.orig.tar.bz2
>
> This is a wonderful resource! Thank you, Janneke (and Debian)!
>
> zimoun 写道：
> > Cool!
> > But how d
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> Didn't you already[0] report this bug as #39288? Then I'll merge
> the two.
no, it's not me. I deny it… Sorry, I'm getting old. Please merge them.
--
Damien Cassou
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston
Hi Ludo,
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 11:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> zimoun skribis:
> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our
> >> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument
>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:47:41AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 21:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>
> > Janneke 写道：
> > > https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20190406T212022Z/pool/main/h/harfbuzz/harfbuzz_2.4.0.orig.tar.bz2
> >
> > This is a wonderful resource!
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 11:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> zimoun skribis:
>> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> >> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our
>> >> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not
Guix,
After adding (specification->package+output "zfs:module") to my
system packages, it's still missing from current-system:
$ guix system reconfigure …
$ ls /run/current-system/profile/lib/modules/
5.4.0-pf7-4-ed26-M88
That's my horrible custom Linux fork/version/abomination.
Apologie
zimoun 写道：
You assume that Debian packs packages as fast as Guix
Indeed I do! :-D
Efraim's solution sounds reasonable.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 15:40, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Exactly. But like I wrote above, I don’t think it’s a strong argument.
I agree and the big picture depends on the audience.
Scientific communities would be fine with centralized archives such as
SWH. And only centralized archives IMHO can p
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020, Jack Hill wrote:
I have opened a bug report upstream:
https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/TOOLS-2482
Upstream reports, "MongoDB 3.4 is now EOL so it is no longer supported.
For MongoDB Tools specifically, we're only making critical fixes to
versions <4.2." Therefore, it seem
Hello all,
In January I upgraded my machine after a long time not doing so. Mostly
things went fine, which is great! Some things didn't, though, so I
started looking.
One is that if I Alt-F2 and then run "~/Documents", I expect Nautilus to
open the folder. Instead Baobab does. This is because
Hi Andy!
> That led me to look and I think there are a number of other
> regressions:
>
> * pinentry-gnome3 is no longer included; this breaks use of GPG and
> GNOME
>
> * font-cantarell and font-dejavu are no longer included; probably
> not
> a good idea?
>
> * xdg-user-dirs is n
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 20:01 +, Scott C. MacCallum via Bug reports
for GNU Guix wrote:
> After the installation of all the available desktop environments,
> in the Enlightenment desktop environment there are multiple programs
> from some of the other desktop environments to choose from, not just
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 16:05 -0500, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Le 6 février 2020 15:44:35 GMT-05:00, "Scott C. MacCallum via Bug
> reports for GNU Guix" a écrit :
> > After the installation of all the available desktop environments,
> > in
> > Openbox from the Accessories menu, Ark File Archiver does
HI Jan,
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 14:24, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
This command
> >> $ guix download -o /tmp/harfbuzz-old.tar.bz2 \
> >>
> >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/file/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2/sha256/1mpah6kwqid1kxsj4rwqsniivqbrx231j65v51yncx6s0dch0dch
now works.
However, this command
$ gui
Le 17 février 2020 12:49:28 GMT-05:00, Jesse Gibbons a
écrit :
>On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 16:05 -0500, Julien Lepiller wrote:
>> Le 6 février 2020 15:44:35 GMT-05:00, "Scott C. MacCallum via Bug
>> reports for GNU Guix" a écrit :
>> > After the installation of all the available desktop environments,
Hello Guix!
@Danny
Could you please reverse my following commits:
1) d36fa50fbf8169018193774782fd21f1b13b9c0e
2) 7922b6f795eb575084546ec9bfb9d40508a9378e
3) 8d8c6bffc528b60574f84620bd6c3ee9bfa1173f
4) a8cda7f57992e9ce9ae4a694eba54e3eab42c39b
I will re-test throughly and re-commit them later.
Hi Andy!
> > That led me to look and I think there are a number of other
> > regressions:
> >
> > * pinentry-gnome3 is no longer included; this breaks use of GPG
> > and
> > GNOME
> >
> > * font-cantarell and font-dejavu are no longer included; probably
> > not
> > a good idea?
> >
Raghav Gururajan 写道：
Could you please reverse my following commits:
1) d36fa50fbf8169018193774782fd21f1b13b9c0e
2) 7922b6f795eb575084546ec9bfb9d40508a9378e
3) 8d8c6bffc528b60574f84620bd6c3ee9bfa1173f
4) a8cda7f57992e9ce9ae4a694eba54e3eab42c39b
Copy-pasted from #guix:
Whoa there, that's dra
> Copy-pasted from #guix:
>
> Whoa there, that's drastic, let's put that on hold.
>
> The first two only add packages (did they break anything? what?),
> the third has no effect on packages if your commit message is
> accurate.
>
> The fourth is the only one that removes packages, and even th
Hello Tobias,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 17., H, 20:03):
>
> Raghav Gururajan 写道：
> > Could you please reverse my following commits:
> >
> > 1) d36fa50fbf8169018193774782fd21f1b13b9c0e
> >
> > 2) 7922b6f795eb575084546ec9bfb9d40508a9378e
> >
>
> I believe the fourth can be reverted if needed.
Some packages that were removed, I made a mistake of not reading the
comments of why it were added in the first place. Some of them were
non-core and some were core but depracated. It gonna take some time for
me to read and understand their exact r
Hi,
It would be great if `guix search TERMS` could show for each record
whether the package is installed and which versions are installed.
I regularly search for a library and then check with guix package -I
whether I already have it, and that’s quite inconvenient.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpoliti
Hi Arne,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 23:16, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> It would be great if `guix search TERMS` could show for each record
> whether the package is installed and which versions are installed.
I agree.
Say if it is already in '/gnu/store' is often helpful.
And "guix search" shoul
23 matches
Mail list logo
