> Copy-pasted from #guix: > > Whoa there, that's drastic, let's put that on hold. > > The first two only add packages (did they break anything? what?), > the third has no effect on packages if your commit message is > accurate. > > The fourth is the only one that removes packages, and even that > might be better tweaked (this time: with comments noting what each > non-core package brings to the GNOME table) than flat-out > reverted. > > What do you think?
I made a mistake of not reading comments of previous commits that were done to gnome meta-package. Since we got lot of feedbacks regarding gnome experience, I will re-conyemplate my plans for gnome, make the changes, test it throughly and then re-commit later. Also, this reverse should be smooth and does not break anything. It just takes the GNOME meta-package back to the time before I started making my commits to it. Regards, RG.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
