bug#29356: 1 test-suite test fails

2017-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Martin, Martin Castillo skribis: > + guix system build t-guix-system-11155 -n > + grep 't-guix-system-11155:3:2: .*module .*qemu.*not found' > t-guix-system-error-11155 > + rm -f t-guix-system-11155 t-guix-system-error-11155 > '/tmp/t-guix-system-11155/*' > + rmdir /tmp/t-guix-system-11155

bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix

2017-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Rutger, Rutger Helling skribis: > test-name: dead path can be explicitly collected > location: > /tmp/guix-build-guix-0.13.0-10.0b4c385.drv-0/source/tests/store.scm:178 > source: > + (test-assert > + "dead path can be explicitly collected" > + (let ((p (add-text-to-store > +

bug#29365: openmolar looking in /usr/share/openmolar

2017-11-20 Thread Quiliro Ordonez Baca
When starting OpenMolar for the first time, it has an error when it creates the application database: ERROR - error creating database tables Traceback (most recent call last): File "/gnu/store/smx5rayf45ylqn59czjkvx2hcrl95p5x-openmolar-1.0.15-gd81f9e5/lib/python3.5/site-packages/openmolar/cre

bug#28223: Guix documentation uses wrong install command

2017-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Rosebud Uplink skribis: > In the Guix documentation, category 2.1 (Binary Installation), step 3, the > command used to augment the PATH doesn't give the wanted result. > > > 3. Make root’s profile available under ~/.guix-profile: > [...] > > # GUIX_PROFILE=$HOME/.guix-profile \ > sourc

bug#28232: openvpn service configuration fails by default

2017-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, charly bion skribis: > Backtrace: > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 592:29 19 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) > 592:29 18 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) > 592:29 17 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) > 592:29 16 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) > 592:29 15 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) > 592:29 14 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) > 592:29 13 (map1 (#< ty

bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix

2017-11-20 Thread Rutger Helling
Hi Ludo, it is indeed reproducible. No matter how many times it always keeps failing on this one test. I've had this problem for a long time, which is a little bit annoying since it means I have to wait until a substitute is available every time. On 2017-11-20 16:55, l...@gnu.org wrote: > Hi

bug#29356: 1 test-suite test fails

2017-11-20 Thread Martin Castillo
Hi Ludo’, On 20.11.2017 10:23, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Could it be that there are stale gnu/packages/qemu.{scm,go} files in the > working tree? > > Thanks in advance, > Ludo’. > yes, there was qemu.go. It works now. What does the apostrophe at the end of your name mean? Martin.

bug#29356: 1 test-suite test fails

2017-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Martin Castillo skribis: > On 20.11.2017 10:23, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Could it be that there are stale gnu/packages/qemu.{scm,go} files in the >> working tree? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Ludo’. >> > > yes, there was qemu.go. It works now. Great, thanks for testing. > What does the

bug#29337: Bash reads system-wide bashrc unconditionally.

2017-11-20 Thread Roel Janssen
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Roel Janssen skribis: > >> On CentOS 7, the following happens (yes, I added the echo-statement to >> /etc/bashrc on CentOS as well): >> $ env - bash --init-file <(echo "echo \"Goodbye, world\"") -i >> Goodbye, world >> >> On GuixSD: >> $ env - bash --init-file <

bug#29244: guix update -u always wants to update: python-wrapper & python-ipython

2017-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Benjamin Andresen skribis: > this is with an empty user account that has no packages installed before this: >> guixsd% guix package -u >> The following packages will be upgraded: >> python-wrapper 3.5.3 → 3.5.3 >> /gnu/store/xnb9bn2vgr3ch8zznsv23w65bb5psshh-python-wrapper-3.5.3 >> python

bug#29368: Unreliable failing tests / segfaulting guile

2017-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Martin Castillo skribis: > test-name: derivation-prerequisites-to-build when outputs already present > location: /home/mcd/guix/tests/derivations.scm:790 > source: > + (test-assert > + "derivation-prerequisites-to-build when outputs already present" > + (let* ((builder '(begin (mkdir

bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix

2017-11-20 Thread Marius Bakke
Hi Rutger, Rutger Helling writes: > when building Guix with 'guix build guix' I keep running into a single > test failure. I've attached the test-suite.log. Is this a Btrfs system by any chance, possibly on an SSD? > test-name: dead path can be explicitly collected > location: > /tmp/guix-bu

bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix

2017-11-20 Thread Rutger Helling
Hi Marius, your patch did the trick, thanks! I'm indeed on Btrfs (with LUKS), no SSD though. On 2017-11-21 01:31, Marius Bakke wrote: > Hi Rutger, > > Rutger Helling writes: > >> when building Guix with 'guix build guix' I keep running into a single >> test failure. I've attached the tes

bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix

2017-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Marius Bakke skribis: > Rutger Helling writes: > >> when building Guix with 'guix build guix' I keep running into a single >> test failure. I've attached the test-suite.log. > > Is this a Btrfs system by any chance, possibly on an SSD? > >> test-name: dead path can be explicitly collect