Hi Ludo, it is indeed reproducible. No matter how many times it always keeps failing on this one test.
I've had this problem for a long time, which is a little bit annoying since it means I have to wait until a substitute is available every time. On 2017-11-20 16:55, l...@gnu.org wrote: > Hi Rutger, > > Rutger Helling <rhell...@mykolab.com> skribis: > >> test-name: dead path can be explicitly collected >> location: >> /tmp/guix-build-guix-0.13.0-10.0b4c385.drv-0/source/tests/store.scm:178 >> source: >> + (test-assert >> + "dead path can be explicitly collected" >> + (let ((p (add-text-to-store >> + %store >> + "random-text" >> + (random-text) >> + '()))) >> + (let-values >> + (((paths freed) (delete-paths %store (list p)))) >> + (and (equal? paths (list p)) >> + (> freed 0) >> + (not (file-exists? p)))))) >> actual-value: #f >> result: FAIL > > I didn't experience this on my laptop. Is it reproducible if you run > "guix build guix" a second time? > > Thanks, > Ludo'.
