Hi,
Thank you for your insights.
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 15:12, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> > --8<---cut here---start->8---
> > guix build -m manifest.scm --with-input=emacs-minimal=emacs-next \
> > --with-input=emacs=emacs-next
> > --8<---cut he
Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Possibly. And then Magit uses emacs-no-x as an input, so we may need to
> also add --with-input=emacs-no-x=emacs-next to the command.
>
> I'm just pointing out that the process is not as straightforward as it
> might seem. So, it doesn't sound right to simply sug
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Perhaps then,
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> guix build -m manifest.scm --with-input=emacs-minimal=emacs-next \
> --with-input=emacs=emacs-next
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
Poss
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> zimoun writes:
>
>> I withdraw the patch proposal since the patch set #43578 [1] fulfills
>> the request. Now, for recompiling all the Emacs packages of one
>> manifest.scm file with the emacs-next package (changing the Emacs VM),
>> it is as ea
Hello,
zimoun writes:
> I withdraw the patch proposal since the patch set #43578 [1] fulfills
> the request. Now, for recompiling all the Emacs packages of one
> manifest.scm file with the emacs-next package (changing the Emacs VM),
> it is as easy as:
>
> --8<---cut here---
Dear,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 16:51, zimoun wrote:
>>> I propose to provide 'package-with-emacs-next' for the people in the
>>> experimental mood. :-) For example, the manifest looks like:
>>>
>>> (use-modules (guix build-system emacs)
>>> (gnu packages emacs)
>>> (gnu
Dear Maxim,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 00:34, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> zimoun writes:
> Sorry for my delayed answer.
Sorry, I have missed your answer.
>> I propose to provide 'package-with-emacs-next' for the people in the
>> experimental mood. :-) For example, the manifest looks like:
>>
>> (u
