Hello, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Possibly. And then Magit uses emacs-no-x as an input, so we may need to > also add --with-input=emacs-no-x=emacs-next to the command. > > I'm just pointing out that the process is not as straightforward as it > might seem. So, it doesn't sound right to simply suggest > > guix build -m manifest.scm --with-input=emacs-minimal=emacs-next > > in the manual/cookbook without caution. > > Or maybe `package-with-emacs-next' could be more high-level, and handle > all of these cases. I don't know. Yeah, that would probably me more convenient/robust to use, if it was covering for all the weird cases one might forget. I'd still be in favor of having such a helper procedure. Maxim
