Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 at 23:43, Marco van Hulten wrote:
>
>> Building julia ends like badly:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> `/gnu/store/zkx3jjnqg043yd3k2kl3lgw57rx39vmy-julia-0.6.0.drv' failed
>
> Does this more-than-2-years-old bug report still make sense? Because
> now, Julia v1.4.1 is
Dear,
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 at 23:43, Marco van Hulten wrote:
> Building julia ends like badly:
[...]
> `/gnu/store/zkx3jjnqg043yd3k2kl3lgw57rx39vmy-julia-0.6.0.drv' failed
Does this more-than-2-years-old bug report still make sense? Because
now, Julia v1.4.1 is included in Guix.
I am in fav
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 07:39:28PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It’s a bit weird that 0.6.0 tests passed at some point in Guix, and
> eventually started failing. Not sure what happened.
Probably an openblas or LLVM update. Unfortunately hydra no longer has
the logs.
Pj.
--
Hey Pjotr,
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> ls deps/scratch/
>
> arpack-ng-3.3.0
> cmake-3.7.1-Linux-x86_64
> curl-7.53.1
> dsfmt-2.2.3
> fftw-3.3.6-pl1-double
> fftw-3.3.6-pl1-single
> gmp-6.1.2
> libgit2-2fcb8705e584ca61f6c4657525c9d2713f6a39d2
> libssh2-30e9c1347e3b
After some investigation I have found Julia's build system to be a
challenge. The problem is that, to 'control' the environment, the
developers have chosen to fixate all dependencies by pulling them in
and patching them (including LLVM). The only time I got a successful
build outside Guix was by us
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:54:18PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:02:07PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I tried the patch below (README.md in Julia 0.6.0 says that plain LLVM
> > 3.9 without patches is OK), but that didn’t solve the
> > distributed.jl-relate
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:02:07PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I tried the patch below (README.md in Julia 0.6.0 says that plain LLVM
> 3.9 without patches is OK), but that didn’t solve the
> distributed.jl-related test failures.
there is a 0.6.2 version already. I do not expect it to
Hi Pjotr,
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> One immediate problem is that Julia comes with patches for LLVM 3.9
> only:
>
> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia#llvm
>
> it downloads, patches and compiles a specific LLVM. We actually need
> this even though the failing tests are possibly not related (I sus
One immediate problem is that Julia comes with patches for LLVM 3.9
only:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia#llvm
it downloads, patches and compiles a specific LLVM. We actually need
this even though the failing tests are possibly not related (I suspect
the math libraries are not showing the sa
> Help welcome!
I'll take a look.
Pj.
--
Hello,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Error in testset linalg/arnoldi:
> Test Failed
> Expression: sort((eigs(A, B, nev=k, sigma=1.0))[1]) ≈ sort((eigvals(A,
> B))[1:k])
>Evaluated: [0.022743, 0.165356, 2.892] ≈ [0.022743, 2.892, 1.0574e15]
> ERROR: LoadError: Test run finished
Hello,
just for reference, I locally updated julia to 0.6.2, and the tests still fail,
but not in the same way:
Error in testset linalg/arnoldi:
Test Failed
Expression: sort((eigs(A, B, nev=k, sigma=1.0))[1]) ≈ sort((eigvals(A,
B))[1:k])
Evaluated: [0.022743, 0.165356, 2.892] ≈ [0.022743, 2
Hi,
Marco van Hulten skribis:
> $ guix package -i julia
> [...]
[...]
> EOFError()CapturedExceptionEOFError(()CapturedException(EOFError()CapturedException(EOFError(EOFError()),
> EOFError(), ,
> Any[Any[(Any[(((::Base.Distributed.##99#100{TCPSocket,TCPSocket,Bool})() at
> event.jl:73, 1)])
Hi—
Building julia ends like badly:
$ guix package -i julia
[...]
base64 (2)|0.41 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 2.10 | 1559.96
serialize (2) |7.05 | 0.29 | 4.1 | 80.75 | 1559.96
WARNING: readuntil(IO,AbstractString) will perform poorly with a long string
W
14 matches
Mail list logo
