Hi Martin,
Martin Castillo skribis:
>> “Address already in use” makes me directly think that there is already
>>another daemon running.
>
> This was in response to OP, saying that I don't think that needs to be
> changed.
>
> The rest was about testing it with root and I (half) expected an erro
Hi,
I could have expressed myself more clearly.
> “Address already in use” makes me directly think that there is already
>another daemon running.
This was in response to OP, saying that I don't think that needs to be changed.
The rest was about testing it with root and I (half) expected an err
Hi Martin,
Martin Castillo skribis:
> “Address already in use” makes me directly think that there is already
> another daemon running. Strangely, starting another daemon as root
> works. It seems to take the socket from the other daemon away. Is this
> intended? Or can two daemons run in paralle
Hi,
“Address already in use” makes me directly think that there is already
another daemon running. Strangely, starting another daemon as root
works. It seems to take the socket from the other daemon away. Is this
intended? Or can two daemons run in parallel without problems?
What is your use case
When trying to start the guix-daemon as an unprivileged user, the
following error message is printed:
error: cannot bind to socket `/var/guix/daemon-socket/socket': Address already
in use
Would it make sense to try to provide a more helpful error message?
