Hi Martin, Martin Castillo <casti...@uni-bremen.de> skribis:
>> “Address already in use” makes me directly think that there is already >>another daemon running. > > This was in response to OP, saying that I don't think that needs to be > changed. > > The rest was about testing it with root and I (half) expected an error > message that explicitly says, that another daemon is already running. If this > was right, op would be right. But this is not the case and it seems like it > is wanted the way it is. > > So yes, there is no problem in my eyes, too. This can be closed. OK, I had completely misunderstood, thanks for clarifying. Closing! Ludo’.
