Ludovic Courtès (2016-02-12 16:49 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> The fact that we have 2 versions is the answer. In Emacs UI a package
>> is not considered to be obsolete if there is a package definition with
>> the same name+version.
>>
>> That's why "texinfo 6.0" is green in the list,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:49:50PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I think we need a different solution for packages that have several
> series. For instance, we could have:
> (define gnupg-2.0
> (package …
> (properties `((series . "2.0")
> and that would lead the various UIs to u
Alex Kost skribis:
> The fact that we have 2 versions is the answer. In Emacs UI a package
> is not considered to be obsolete if there is a package definition with
> the same name+version.
>
> That's why "texinfo 6.0" is green in the list, not red (as obsolete
> packages).
Oh, to me, ^ meant “u
Ludovic Courtès (2016-02-11 12:11 +0300) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In current Guix master we have Texinfo 6.0 and 6.1. With 6.0 installed
> in my profile, hitting ^ in the M-x guix-installed-packages buffer does
> not mark Texinfo as a candidate for upgrade.
The fact that we have 2 versions is the ans
Hello!
In current Guix master we have Texinfo 6.0 and 6.1. With 6.0 installed
in my profile, hitting ^ in the M-x guix-installed-packages buffer does
not mark Texinfo as a candidate for upgrade.
Ludo’.
