bug#74455: gcc-toolchain and gfortran-toolchain conflict

Hi, On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 08:57, Laurent Gatto wrote: > But fails I add gfortran-toolchain *after* gcc-toolchain That’s because both are “more or less” some GCC toolchain and provides similar subset of files. Here, the version of the both default toolchains does not match (14 vs 11). Since t

bug#67241: [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Add message about Info reader.

Hi Maxim, On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 16:58, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hm. I agree duplication is not nice. Probably a naming issue ;-) Arf, as we know: « There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things. » :-) > According to git blame these lines were also

bug#67241: [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Add message about Info reader.

Hi Maxim, On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 at 11:53, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> +_info() >> +{ >> +if [ "$(type -P info)" ]; then >> +_msg "$1" >> +else >> +_msg "${WAR}Please install Info reader; see package 'info-reader'" >> +_msg "$1" >> +fi >> +} > > It seems odd to me

bug#73816: python-django's manage.py tries to use a hard-coded python executable

Hi, On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 12:48, Gabriel Wicki wrote: > If you have any idea on how to patch that and could point me in that > direction, I'll gladly send in a patch or two! It needs to replace the phases something like: --8<---cut here---start->8--- 1 file

bug#74835: guix install download extra outputs when it should not

Hi, Please consider the package ’x265’. If one installs it with the option ’no-grafts’ then everything works as expected. However, if one installs it with the default command line, then the output ’static’ is downloaded when it should not. Please note this package is not grafted. Below, a repr

bug#73816: python-django's manage.py tries to use a hard-coded python executable

Hi, On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 11:48, Gabriel Wicki wrote: > The python-django package makes the admin utility create a manage.py > file with a hard-coded python interpreter. > > $ guix shell python python-django -- django-admin startproject foobar > $ head -n 1 foobar/manage.py > > #!/gnu/st

bug#73714: error doing guix pull

Hi, On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 at 01:34, Mauro Panigada wrote: > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/471kd49s8c1gja915yk50cng7zizyv9y-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "abb9f60109edab8c35297596a25e63c2565ac284"; system: "x86_64-lin

bug#73729: Failed compute derivation

.4.0"; pull-version: 1). Hum, nothing good. Is it consistent? Well, I think it’s another instance of this too long list: toward a plan? (was Re: Reducing "You found a bug" reports) Simon Tournier Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:51:09 +0200 id:87wmjjd0ki...

bug#73858: bug report

Hi, On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 18:46, guix-error via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > # guix pull > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at > 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... > Building from this channel: > guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.gitd955882 > bu

bug#74032: Disarchive certificate expired

H, On Mon, 02 Dec 2024 at 12:32, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> it looks like the HTTPS certificate for https://disarchive.guix.gnu.org/ has >> expired 2 weeks ago. [...] > we should look for a more definitive solution. What could it be? Cheers simon

bug#47638: [Emacs-Guix] build-farm-url.el refers to former URLs

Hi, On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 11:33, Cayetano Santos via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: >> I just noticed that build-farm-url.el refers to deprecated/outdated >> URLs: hydra.gnu.org, ci.guix.info, etc. > > I have send a pull request to fix upstream urls: > > https://github.com/alezost/build-fa

bug#73645: Unable to update system due to lsof build failing on ffmpegthumbnailer and pam-mount

Hi. On Sun, 06 Oct 2024 at 17:15, not emma via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > hi, thank you for getting back on this. it likely is related to the > upstream issue, and i'd be good on closing this out Since the bug seems coming from upstream, I would be tempted to close the one here. Or wha

bug#74489: Guix said to email you this.

Hi, On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 03:15, Mark Dewey wrote: > I reinstalled Guix and did a pull before installing icecat (instead of > afterward), this time, and now it works fine. Thanks to let us know. So closing. Since it's already reported elsewhere(I guess) and known. Cheers, simon

bug#74489: Guix said to email you this.

Hi, On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 at 02:32, Mark Dewey wrote: > \guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/3sszk0lgfc72vjfrvzajhhsldxq1lrij-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "9b1de856cf1870feda070d03eeb98f532c466238"; system: "x86_64-linu

bug#74471: Problem doing "guix pull"

Hi, On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 at 10:14, david lopez villegas wrote: > '/gnu/store/w4hxpabli1cyycq1sin0309gzffmc543-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "285c78cb89cd0ef3775406eca9af9aa87de212a0"; system: "x86_64-linux"; > host version: "7f8c98530a769fc6dc7c

bug#74584: wrong pull/time-machine message when channels.scm does not exit

Hi, The “bug“: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ ls channels.scm ls: cannot access 'channels.scm': No such file or directory $ guix time-machine -q -C channels.scm -- help guix time-machine: error: 'channels.scm' did not return a list of channels --8<---

bug#74015: 'guix shell --export-manifest' fails for some transformations

Hi, On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 10:33, Suhail Singh wrote: > Simon Tournier writes: > >> However, I am proposing: Aside the profile ’manifest’ file (lossy >> process), we could store all the manifests provided by the command >> line. Something

bug#67241: [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Add message about Info reader.

index f07b2741bb..08e25de238 100755 --- a/etc/guix-install.sh +++ b/etc/guix-install.sh @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ # Copyright © 2018 Efraim Flashner # Copyright © 2019–2020, 2022 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice # Copyright © 2020 Morgan Smith -# Copyright © 2020 Simon Tournier +# Copyright © 2020, 2024 Simon

bug#67240: dev: “make” of Guix fails, non-existent .git/hooks directory

Hi, On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 16:06, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> cp: cannot create regular file '.git/hooks/pre-push': No such file or >> directory >> make[2]: *** [Makefile:7454: .git/hooks/pre-push] Error 1 >> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/simon/src/guix/guix' >> make[1]: *** [Makefile:6137: a

bug#74015: 'guix shell --export-manifest' fails for some transformations

Hi, On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 at 12:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> $ guix shell -m manifest.scm --export-manifest > > ‘--export-manifest’ is meant to “translate” a command line, which it can > do faithfully; there’s no way it could possibly “recreate” what > ‘manifest.scm’, which may contain arbitrary

bug#74204: [bug#74112] Guix is not reproducible

Hi, On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 23:25, Hilton Chain via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: >> I can confirm the reproducibility issue. >> >> I have two x86_64-linux machines building guix to verify the fix, I'll apply >> your patch once they produce matching outputs. > > Took me quite a while to build

bug#35085: Emacs is not reproducible

Hi, On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 12:34, Cayetano Santos via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Follow up as for today on emacs 29.4. The good news: https://emacsconf.org/2024/talks/repro/ Let see if there is an upstream willing to tackle this. :-) Cheers, simon

bug#73602: bug#73601: failed to compute the derivation for Guix

Hi Fabrice, On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 15:00, Fabrice Tudoret wrote: > The storm is over and users no longer complain. Cool! Good news. :-) Closing? Cheers, simon

bug#73601: bug#73602: bug#73601: failed to compute the derivation for Guix

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 14:03, Fabrice Tudoret wrote: >> c) Display the both derivations, as root and as regular user >> >># guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d > > [root@cluster24 ~]# guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commenc

bug#74015: 'guix shell --export-manifest' fails for some transformations

Hi, I notice this: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ cat manifest.scm (use-modules (guix transformations) (guix packages) (guix download) (guix build-system r)) (define r-knitr (specification->package "r-knitr")) (define r-knitr-other (package

bug#73602: bug#73601: failed to compute the derivation for Guix

quot;) ,("preferLocalBuild","1")]) --8<---cut here---end--->8--- I guess you also have the same build-utils.scm. Don’t you? Therefore, I guess the difference is either an environment variable (the list starting with GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED) or the file /gnu/store/…-qcompile-modules. Hum, it would be weird that it comes from compile-modules… Ah my train is at destination. To be continued… Let me know! Cheers, simon 1: Re: Derivations differ between computers? zimoun Fri, 26 Nov 2021 01:49:00 +0100 id:86lf1bspvn@gmail.com https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-11 https://yhetil.org/guix/86lf1bspvn@gmail.cmo 2: Guix extension to display derivation (and rewrite fixed-output) Simon Tournier Fri, 12 Apr 2024 20:28:11 +0200 id:87ttk6phac@gmail.com https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-04 https://yhetil.org/guix/87ttk6phac@gmail.com

bug#73602: failed to compute the derivation for Guix

Hi Fabrice, > Unfortunately my GUIX is still in a bad mood or worst, since I have > troubles with all users now. Oh! It means something is incorrectly configured for sure. :-( > The issue is not limited to the "pull", I have also a problem with the > command "guix package -i hello": Yes, that

bug#73601: failed to compute the derivation for Guix

Hi, On mer., 02 oct. 2024 at 16:27, Fabrice Tudoret wrote: > [hjebbari@cluster24 ~]$ guix pull > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at > 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... > Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to a47d7af (2 new commits)... Well, it’s confusing.

bug#55032: Bug from guix pull

Hi, On mer., 11 sept. 2024 at 06:31, "Yuxuan 'fishy' Wang" wrote: >> Well, I am in favor to close this report. And if you have the problem >> again, you could open another issue. WDYT? > > Sounds good to me. Feel free to close this report. Thanks for the reply! Closed. Thanks, simon

bug#58838: Bug report

Hi, On mar., 10 sept. 2024 at 12:14, EricR Rasmussen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024, 11:19 AM Simon Tournier > wrote: > > Yeah, this issue is resolved. LOL. Thanks. Thanks for your reply. >> Well, I am in favor to close this report. WDYT? Closing. Thanks, simon

bug#69550: smithforth: missing source (?)

Hi, On mar., 10 sept. 2024 at 09:37, Christopher Howard wrote: > Simon Tournier writes: > >> Therefore, you can run: >> >> $ guix build smithforth --sources=all >> /gnu/store/4w4v7zv4vif2k55g9srmv57fg5icpl94-SForth220711dmp.txt >> /gnu/store/lvrkhx3yzjk58ma

bug#73314: PyPI importer gives null at home-page for some packages

Hi, On mar., 17 sept. 2024 at 14:23, Evgeny Pisemsky wrote: > For example, this command: > > guix import pypi snitun@0.35.0 That’s probably because the JSON file metadata stored in PyPI does not have the information. Well, do you prefer #false in order to be consistent with the rest, as license

bug#59196: `guix pull` fails on A20-OLinuXino-LIME2-eMMC

Hi Tanguy, On jeu., 12 sept. 2024 at 08:33, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote: >> What is the status of this bug report? > > As I mentioned: "I think I'll redirect my energy to other tasks for the time > being…" > That’s exactly what I did!… and forgot to close the bug! 😅 > Should I just do that? Closed

bug#55554: A bug of guix in the MX/Distro

Hi, On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 18:19, Simon Tournier wrote: > Well, I am in favor to close it. WDYT? In agreement with Victor's private message, closing. Cheers, simon

bug#67979: guix pull failed with error

Hi, On dim., 15 sept. 2024 at 15:08, Wensheng Xie wrote: > On 二, 2024-09-10 at 16:04 +0200, Simon Tournier wrote: >> What happens if you run: [...] > Thank you for looking into this bug. > > After I changed my channel to the official guix channel (slower), the > problem i

bug#73292: “guix shell --pure“ displays twice the same warning

Hi, --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix shell --pure guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment --8<---cut here---end---

bug#70689: guix search doesn't weigh word matches higher than subword matches

Hi, On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 22:18, Richard Sent wrote: >> Inetutils is a collection of common network programs, such as an ftp >> client and server, a telnet client and server, an rsh client and >> server, and hostname. > > Most likely, this is what the user is interested in. However, inetutils >

bug#56836: guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program...

Hi, On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 17:52, DDC wrote: > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/5xv3aac4lkfvvgyhs65l7a3r809h6iaj-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "d1c6b8db5a30f9e428d018156dadb12927c485f8"; system: "x86_64-linux"; > host

bug#64963: guix pull bug

Hi, On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 at 23:07, Jordan Russell wrote: > One bit of context about this bug is I was running dnf update at the > same time as this ocurred. re-running guix pull later failed to > repdroduce the bug. Sadly, most of the time, errors happening with “guix pull” are transient and ha

bug#69070: ‘guix lint -c archival python-scikit-learn’ crashes

Hi Ludo, On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 11:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > (Note that this problem may vanish once > has been merged.) This had been merged. Now, it does not crash. Is the problem hidden or vanished? Cheers, simon

bug#63830: guix pull error

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 at 14:22, Aaron Ash wrote: > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/9l6gwizqlnnrm6yhw5ff7nk5ngfqbyc2-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "b4382b294e6cd475e9476610d98fdd0bdaec4c84

bug#61542: emacs-next doesn't load .eln files

Hi, On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 02:11, "ytc" wrote: > Hello. I've noticed that when I install Emacs packages with > `--with-input=emacs-minimal=emacs-next' transformation option, Emacs > cannot load native compiled files. The reason might be that the > byte-compiled files of those packages couldn't

bug#55554: A bug of guix in the MX/Distro

Hi, Sorry for the late reply and thank you for the report. On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 22:31, Victor H wrote: > HI: > I get a bug while doing "guix pull" > I hope the output in the file I send could be useful. More than often, this error is transient coming from network (substitutes side, your side,

bug#58013: Can't use guix pull

Hi, On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 at 13:23, zimoun wrote: > Hum, was the initial report done using the root account? > > Because it appears more than weird that Guix fails with the sequence > > guix describe -f channels > channels.scm > guix time-machine -C channels.scm -- help > > which is what y

bug#56681: Guix error report

Hi, Sorry for the very late reply. Thanks for the report. On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 at 17:21, Kevin Morris wrote: > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/lm4i0rd29gxfahw904gndpwpii7q2qj7-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "3f1715

bug#59876: Bug.

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. On Thu, 08 Dec 2022 at 01:38, Ping Pong wrote: > That is as much as I can remember. Ah, so it’d be near to impossible to tackle this. :-) I’m closing. Feel free to reopen or raise your hand if I am missing something. Cheers, simon

bug#55032: Bug from guix pull

Hi, Thank you for the report and sorry for the very late reply. On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 22:04, Yuxuan 'fishy' Wang wrote: > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/zgzaz6c723pjkykiqnpnqr9rmylf69dq-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version

bug#55884: I have a problem wıth my computer

Hi User Googlov, Sorry for the vert late reply. On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 17:39, Maxime Devos wrote: > User Googlov schreef op do 09-06-2022 om 20:26 [-0800]: >> Hello, I can't update my computer. The site https://guix.gnu.org/ is >> not available in my country. I don't know if IP address or domai

bug#60547: guix pull: Error in procedure 'get-bytevector-n*'

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. On Wed, 04 Jan 2023 at 15:12, "Artyom V. Poptsov" wrote: > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/w1286dmwlhha7gp09s50w8fpx9rs1qi4-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "d62c65d5ad49d3bf7ae24b31743

bug#58838: Bug report

Hi, Sorry for the very late reply. Thanks for the report. On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 18:18, EricR Rasmussen wrote: > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/kiiasri3ygd4c6k3r9ljyf0m2mcnidhs-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "d5

bug#55933: Fails download of quix 1.3 virtual machine

Hi, Very late… Well hunting old bugs. :-) On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 23:14, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Thanks for the report. I'm CC'ing as documented here[0] to get > their opinion. [...] > However, there does seem to be an inconsistency with the GNU FTP server: > > ~ λ curl -LI > https://

bug#59196: `guix pull` fails on A20-OLinuXino-LIME2-eMMC

Hi Tanguy, On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 at 18:53, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote: > /guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/mbs3lc77zy30nr82lnn2s135i2rvq095-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "ba8679fb2452f4466a98a99edf050ea7452c83f4"; system

bug#64090: Cannot compute a file with a G-exp

Hi, On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 at 17:27, "(" wrote: > Robby Zambito writes: >> Strangely with-extensions doesn't seem to be including the whole >> dependency tree for me. Should it? > > No, I don't think it should. It *would* be possible to traverse the > package inputs and add all the GUILE-BUILD-SYST

bug#72495: `guix --version` not really helpful

Hi, On Tue, 06 Aug 2024 at 12:14, Stéfane Fermigier wrote: > When I type: > > guix --version > > I get: > > guix (GNU Guix) 6689a96ce86497299bd29f183b744116fd2d6e32 > > That's not really helpful (i.e. it doesn't tell how old / up to date my > system is). A proper version number (e.g. "x.y.z-deve

bug#56580: 1.3.0 internet connectivity bug

Hi Peter, Sorry for the very late reply. On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 15:59, Peter wrote: > For some bizarre reason, even though it worked last night, today the > 1.3.0 usb could no longer establish an internet connection on the > intel wired ethernet. Just a red screen saying no connectivity. > > Th

bug#60648: guix pull command fails

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. On Sun, 08 Jan 2023 at 07:18, Girish M wrote: > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/x2lwzisrlg1w6s4giayjzgfy9rzhly5b-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "17a672524e44ec11847ec166c51731c7ada7ce99"

bug#55932: error report

Hi, Sorry for the very late reply and thank you for the report. On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 19:45, Anedroid wrote: > ERROR: > 1. &http-get-error: > uri: #< scheme: https userinfo: #f host: "ci.guix.gnu.org" > port: #f path: "/nar/lzip/gkjna040y14xvk4y5mcccvjkkmdcvmnv-font-dejavu- > 2.37" que

bug#69550: smithforth: missing source (?)

Hi, On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 at 10:07, Christopher Howard wrote: > ``` guix build -S smithforth > /gnu/store/4w4v7zv4vif2k55g9srmv57fg5icpl94-SForth220711dmp.txt > ``` > > ...I only get the annotated header/opcode file. However, the forth system > provided in the binary includes also the words defi

bug#64059: Sudden unexplained error during guix pull: "channel dependency has an invalid introduction field"

Hi, On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 01:37, "N. Y." wrote: >> I've purposefully added this new error to warn users that their >> .guix-channel's introduction forms were erroneous. Previously, they >> were silently being dropped. The formats in a channels.scm file and in >> the .guix-channel file are

bug#67979: guix pull failed with error

Hi, On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 08:46, Wensheng Xie wrote: > Here is the information from terminal: > > guix pull: compressing cached Git repository at > '/home/wxie/.cache/guix/checkouts/vkjy73mbbefpvcinhoaz3khygyu6zo4yxnr3orf75523s3fldlvq'... > guix pull: Fehler: > '/gnu/store/xg500s4zygcgl94188bi

bug#71625: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 23:41, dan...@tutanota.com wrote: > (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value > (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f)) It means you have one channel that does not define this ’linux-libre-headers-6.8’ symbo

bug#72984: Acknowledgement (wine64 fails to build: guix/build/utils.scm:761:4: In procedure alist-cons-after: Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching pattern" ())'.)

Hi, On Mon, 02 Sep 2024 at 21:26, "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Fixed by https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72922 Therefore, closing? Cheers, simon

bug#72872: Learning Debbugs - documentation unclear - test

Hi jgart, On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 12:36, jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > I recommend to use mumi instead of debbugs. Debbugs is confusing. You cannot avoid Debbugs. ;-) Debbugs is the name of the issue tracker system [1]. And Mumi is one front-end. Other front-ends are: plain ema

bug#73030: bug#73076: Inputs for git:send-email

Hi Andreas, On Fri, 06 Sep 2024 at 18:15, Andreas Enge wrote: > I think this may be a consequence of the recent core-updates merge. Duplicate of . Fixed by acba6223b5268ece0c6cb4b1ce346f5dc5e8affc. Closing. Cheers, simon

bug#73030: git send-email missing perl packages [partially FIXED]

Hi, For the fixes see <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/73034>. Explanation below. On Wed, 04 Sep 2024 at 20:57, Simon Tournier wrote: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > Not using SSL_VERIFY_PEER due to out-of-date IO::Socket::SSL. > To use

bug#73030: git send-email missing perl packages

Hi, Using the fix , I get this error: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Need MIME::Base64 and Authen::SASL todo auth at /gnu/store/imnyk8h2s6qfwd602n5vqxax8h33j2k5-git-2.45.2-send-email/libexec/git-core/.git-send-email-real line

bug#73030: git send-email missing perl packages

Hi, Using Guix 7fa9df4, I get the error: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Not using SSL_VERIFY_PEER due to out-of-date IO::Socket::SSL. To use SSL please install IO::Socket::SSL with version>=2.007 at /gnu/store/v6bivyjbg6bj07s8iqfzdm6hpvypc0p1-perl-5.36.0/lib/pe

bug#73002: Julia packages are not reproducible

Hi Ludo, On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 at 13:56, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Currently Julia packages, as built with Julia 1.8.3, are not > reproducible. Here’s a small sample: Duplicate with: bug#47354: (build-system julia) not reproducible zimoun Wed, 24 Mar 2021 01:37:07 +0100

bug#72333: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-minimal: Do not native-compile lisp/transient.el.

On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 21:47, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > > Should we do this in a snippet instead? Otherwise LGTM. > > I left it as a phase, so that Emacsen with modified source also > benefit. I think it's better as a phase because of what you wrote and also because "guix build -S emacs" r

bug#72340: guix should not ask me to report a bug if it fails due to running out of memory

Hi, On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 at 11:30, "Zack Weinberg" wrote: > I reconfigured my Guix system to avoid the bug, so I cannot easily > trigger it anymore. However, this is not a bug that would go away by > accident. Yes for sure, that’s not what I meant. :-) This can happen if a cycle is introduced,

bug#72333: builtin native-compiled is loaded instead of emacs-packages

Hi Liliana, On Mon, 02 Sep 2024 at 21:22, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > It is a bug unique to our handling in Guix Well, waiting a proper fix and a better story for Emacs package native compilation, I propose to turn off the native-compilation for lisp/transient.el only; see [1]. This fixes

bug#72340: guix should not ask me to report a bug if it fails due to running out of memory

Hi, On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 16:02, "Zack Weinberg" via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... \ > GC Warning: Failed to expand heap by 8388608 bytes > [previous line repeats 79 more times] > GC Warning: Failed to expand heap by 69632 bytes > GC Warning:

bug#72333: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-minimal: Do not native-compile lisp/transient.el.

Fixes . Reported by daniel szmulewicz . * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-minimal)[arguments]: Turn off native-compilation for the file lisp/transient.el. Change-Id: I27c9d660cbad46be66df641816e4596346969dfc --- gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 10 ++ 1 file chan

bug#72061: Discrepancy when running ‘guix pull’ from different machines

Hi Konrad, On Mon, 02 Sep 2024 at 17:31, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > The "channels.scm" attached to my last message describes Guix at the > time "guix time-machine" was launched. It's not the channels file used > in the time machine command! That one is quite short: In your previous message, you wro

bug#72333: builtin native-compiled is loaded instead of emacs-packages

Oups, missing some edits, as usual. :-) > However, it should be an issue since emacs-transient is correctly > updated and correctly contains the requirements. it should *NOT* be an issue

bug#72333: builtin native-compiled is loaded instead of emacs-packages

ient-prefix-object) scope)) --8<---cut here---end--->8--- Therefore, the issue… On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 18:33, Simon Tournier wrote: > Why is emacs-transient not loaded? …is something about loading Emacs Lisp code. --8<---cut here---

bug#72332: bug report

Hi, On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 06:17, Sarah Schaffer via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > ERROR: > 1. &store-protocol-error: > message: "`/gnu/store/5kj8lyybjrdl7xd0fx9g9vzkz8sklqsy-guix-1.4.0/bin/guix > substitute' died unexpectedly" > status: 1 > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program >

bug#72832: duplicate downloads when running “guix pull”

Hi, On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 at 20:32, Simon Tournier wrote: > 2. remaining derivation about boot or mesboot. Well, from my understanding, this leads to concrete problem as bug#72774 [1]. Cheers, simon 1: bug#72774: guix pull fails (findutils-boot0 check phase) on riscv64 Daniel K Fri, 23

bug#72061: Discrepancy when running ‘guix pull’ from different machines

Hi Konrad, CC: Ludo, do you think it comes from the commit c14b8636fb: “records: Do not inline the constructor.”? On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 21:35, Konrad Hinsen wrote: >> Could you share the channels.scm file? > > Attached. Thanks. Do you know what the current Guix revision? It should have no

bug#72832: duplicate downloads when running “guix pull”

Hi, Well, I notice several similar downloads when running “guix pull” or “guix time-machine”; see complete log below. This reports and investigates 2 different origins for these duplicates: 1. graft with multiple outputs; 2. remaining derivation about boot or mesboot. For instance, when pull

bug#72061: Discrepancy when running ‘guix pull’ from different machines

Hi Konrad, On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 10:05, Konrad Hinsen wrote: >guix time-machine --channels=channels.scm -- shell --container --network > --manifest=manifest.scm -- jupyter lab >guix-science/build-system/node.scm:119:2: error: #{ > %make-build-system-procedure/abi-check}#: unbound vari

bug#72259: guix system: "guix graph -t referrers" could be more helpful in some cases

Hi, On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 13:24, "Zack Weinberg" via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > I would have expected "guix graph -t referrers" > to report that the package was a direct dependency of the > operating-system derivation itself Hum, I do not think that “guix graph” operated

bug#72266: this-package-input for multiple outputs package

Hi, For the good or the bad, we have package with multiple outputs. For instance, see ’git’ with ’git:send-email’ and others. However, it’s not always easy to work with them using the “new style”. For a concrete example: . A minimal example. --8<-

bug#70551: channel-with-substitutes-available without network

Hi, On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 at 10:14, Simon Tournier wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 16:43, Simon Tournier wrote: > >> Out of any network, I get this error: [...] >> Well, the proposed fix is here to catch the error; maybe it could be >> finer than #t. [...] > F

bug#72174: guix download does not support Mercurial

Hi, On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 at 09:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> I studied `guix download -h` which shows that `guix download` only >> supports Git repositories. Since there is `hg-download`, it would >> make sense that the command `guix download` support Mercurial. > > Indeed, only Git is supported

bug#72135: Debian ‘guix’ package lacks zstd support

Hi, On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 at 09:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> That said, after “apt install guix”, does the guix-daemon update work? >> Somehow if “guix pull” as root fails after a fresh install via APT, then >> it’s a bug on Guix side, else it’s a bug on Debian side tracked by >> 1072918. :-) > >

bug#72135: Debian ‘guix’ package lacks zstd support

Hi Ludo, On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 10:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > (I know this should be a Debian bug report, but I’m sorta acting as a > proxy. :-)) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072918 Reported by: Marvin Krause Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:45:01 UTC

bug#72161: doc: 'Sending a Patch Series' inconsistent with 'Building from Git'

Hi, As reported in [1], because of a change in ’guix git authenticate’ then ’git send-email’ needs more configuration than expected. >From ’(guix) Sending a Patch Series’ [2], it reads: Assuming you have already configured Git according to ’Configuring Git’, you can simply use:

bug#72061: Discrepancy when running ‘guix pull’ from different machines

Hi Ludo, Thank you for the pedestrian report; I have learnt new stuff! :-) On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 17:33, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Presumably whether ‘builtin:git-download’ is used changes the DAG > traversal order, which could explain this discrepancy. > > It does mean that all the users runni

bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla

Hi Vincent, On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 at 16:54, Vincent Legoll wrote: > Looking at the comments in this issue, and the commenters list, > I propose to remove the "easy" tag, if the issue is still there. I removed the tag easy. Well, I still think it’s an easy fix because to me the issue is not the f

bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla

tags 28510 - easy quit

bug#71952: documentation inaccuracy?

Hi, >> $ guix home switch-generation -- -1 >> guix home: error: -1: extraneous command Indeed, the command-line parser seems incorrect and inconsistent with the documentation. The culprit seems the procedure ’parse-args’ from ’guix-home’ command inside the module (guix scripts home). Hum, I gue

bug#71700: The Archiving functionality of guix lint should be opt-in and Documented more prominently

Hi Richard, On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 at 09:21, Richard Sent wrote: > I think there is a good reason to support disabling archival at the > channel level. Simon, do you think your patch can/will manage that? Yeah it could be helpful. However, my patch does not address at this level. I agree it coul

bug#71700: The Archiving functionality of guix lint should be opt-in and Documented more prominently

Hi, On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 19:45, MSavoritias wrote: > I would like to propose to make that linter off by default. Somehow I disagree with this. And I propose the generic approach that allows to exclude any checkers from the package definition using the field properties. See

bug#71151: time machine breaking

Hi, On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 19:30, Alexandre Hannud Abdo wrote: > I no longer have easy access to the other machine, it belonged to a > colleague... So closing? Cheers, simon

bug#70201: Bug Report

Hi, Thanks for the report. On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 at 12:53, Charles MacDonald via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: >> guix substitute: warning: while fetching >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/21wnzvrrvn100w3q0bb5c894hqyn5b5d-guile-lzma-0.1.1: >> >> server is somewhat slow >> guix substitute:

bug#70200: Guix pull bug found

Hi, Thanks for the report. On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 at 11:37, casket_imagery.01--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > I was trying to update Gix package manager on a fresh Debian instance > in ProxMox, and as I was doing so, I got the below error. As requested > by the script, I am sending you t

bug#70243: The substitute authorization warning is displayed when it shouldn't be

Hi, On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 11:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> But, I do have the given key in my '/etc/guix/acl', and this works: > > Are /etc/guix/acl and /etc/guix world-readable? I had been bitten by this recently. And I have not found any mention about that in the manual. Maybe it could hel

bug#70064: Error when loading r-sf and other spatial packages (gdal related)

Hi, On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 at 18:04, Javier Vaquero Martínez wrote: > So I managed to solve this. It turns out that some environment variables > where making this error to happen. Running in an isolated environment > with `guix shell -C r r-sf -- r` solves the problem. Thanks for letting us know

bug#47144: security patching of 'patch' package

Hi, On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 at 18:04, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > What about renaming ‘patch’ to ‘patch/pinned’ and having ‘patch’ point > to the new version? > > Internally, we’d refer to ‘patch/pinned’ in (guix packages), but user > code etc. would refer to ‘patch’ and thus get the latest version. I

  1   2   3   4   5   >