bug#70954: No 'guix pull' substitutes for foreign distros?

Hi Florian Pelz, https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Channels-with-Substitutes.html Yes, I'm aware about this feature. It doesn't help. it might be bad timing. I think this possibility can be excluded because of: 1) I have performed 'guix pull' on the system B for the last few months (

bug#70663: nss@3.99 is really hard to build

Maxim Cournoyer writes: Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver writes: Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: Christopher Baines writes: [...] At least from what I can see on the issues, the problem was introduced with the update to 3.98.0 [3] and then continued with the update to 3.99 [4]. Given the ch

bug#70926: Having default nss-certs plus nss-certs in operating-system packages causes problems

Hello, Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Am Montag, dem 13.05.2024 um 22:38 +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines: >> I've seen this when updating systems, but it seems like something is >> wrong with the handling of nss-certs. >> >> I'm on a guix revision with nss-certs by default, and when I add >>

bug#70850: question on nss-certs

Hello, jbra...@dismail.de writes: > May 10, 2024 at 1:51 AM, "Antonio Carlos Padoan Junior" > wrote: > > > >> >> jbra...@dismail.de writes: >> >> > >> > May 9, 2024 at 1:53 PM, "Olivier Dion" wrote: >> > >> > The best place for bugs, is to discuss them on bug-guix@gnu.org. That way >> >

bug#70663: nss@3.99 is really hard to build

Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> Christopher Baines writes: > [...] >>> At least from what I can see on the issues, the problem was introduced >>> with the update to 3.98.0 [3] and then continued with the update to 3.99 >>> [4]. Given the changes in 7

bug#70960: [PATCH] gnu: Remove mozjs-91.

Hallo, Jonathan! Am Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:12:10PM +0200 schrieb Jonathan Brielmaier: > I'm not sure we should remove it yet. > 0ad (the only reverse-dependency of mozjs@78) at master branch uses > mozjs@91. So the next release of it would require mozjs@91. thanks for the info! It agrees with th

bug#70960: [PATCH] gnu: Remove mozjs-91.

Hallo Andreas, Am 15.05.24 um 21:13 schrieb Andreas Enge: * gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm (mozjs-91): Delete variable. I'm not sure we should remove it yet. 0ad (the only reverse-dependency of mozjs@78) at master branch uses mozjs@91. So the next release of it would require mozjs@91. See: https:

bug#70960: [PATCH] gnu: Remove mozjs-91.

* gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm (mozjs-91): Delete variable. Change-Id: I121a480eb15d670461a70b7703a3a658d9db6732 --- gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm | 31 --- 1 file changed, 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm b/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm index 814b610bba..6

bug#70960: Remove mozjs and icu4c versions

Well, icu4c-69 is needed by mozjs-78, so we cannot remove it. But mozjs-91 should be good to remove. Let QA give us its opinion. Andreas

bug#70960: Remove mozjs and icu4c versions

To partially answer my questions: Am Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:46:47PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: > The only package depending on mozjs@78 is 0ad. Maybe the dependency > can be upgraded? 0ad is on the latest release, and cannot be built with any other of the mozjs versions we currently have. So I

bug#70841: Upgrade-Shepherd-Services Error when adding wayland support to gdm

Hi, not emma via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > guix system: error: error parsing derivation > `/gnu/store/4xz1998qw8niax3pi0lsbwxfl7dfrpil- > > upgrade-shepherd-services > > .drv': > expected string `Derive([' This looks like a store integrity issue, you might want to repair it using `guix

bug#70960: Remove mozjs and icu4c versions

After a recent patch updating the icu4c@68 dependency of 0ad to icu4c, I have gone through icu4c and mozjs dependents. It turns out that nothing depends on mozjs@91. Can it be removed? Then I think that icu4c@69 can also be removed. The only package depending on mozjs@78 is 0ad. Maybe the depende

bug#70258: FreeCAD dependency probably outdated

Fixed by . signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#70698: python-pivy build fails (freecad dependency)

Fixed by . signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#70954: No 'guix pull' substitutes for foreign distros?

Hello Nigko Yerden. You could definitely test if substitutes are never available if you used https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Channels-with-Substitutes.html which should guarantee that it will use a version of Guix where guix pull has substitutes. When not using channel-with-substitutes