Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes:
> Hi Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes: > [...] >>> At least from what I can see on the issues, the problem was introduced >>> with the update to 3.98.0 [3] and then continued with the update to 3.99 >>> [4]. Given the changes in 70662 were sent to guix-patches and then >>> merged less than 24 hours later, I'd imagine that wasn't sufficient time >>> for data.qa.guix.gnu.org to fail attempting to build nss. >> >> I think in [3] you meant https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70569, not #70662. >> >> Since this was security sensitive, I built it on x86_64, tested it there >> to ensure that IceCat worked as expected, had others confirmed it worked >> for them on #guix then pushed. > [...] >>> 3: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70662 >>> 4: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70618 > > Note that the IceCat package in Guix currently uses the copy of NSS that > comes bundled with the IceCat source code, so testing IceCat probably > won't tell you much about whether the standalone NSS package in Guix > works properly. Thanks for the heads-up. It looks like there are now some low hanging fruits in terms of unbundling opportunities for icecat/Icedove! -- Thanks, Maxim
