bug#44301: Black screen in Guix System installation

2020-10-31 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
I do not know if you deliberately did not reply to all. I hope you do not mind me quoting you. On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 04:16:11PM -0400, Douglas Linford wrote: > Is recompiling the kernel to include radeon an option? > Meaning, can I recompile the kernel myself? > > Douglas Guix will not provid

bug#44261: running a daemon with userns in relocateble pack breaks

2020-10-31 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello, > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: > > [...] > >>> If you confirm that it works for you and looks reasonable, we can apply >>> it. >> >> Yes, this works. The test and also my reproducer now work fine. > > Thanks for checking, I pushed the fi

bug#44196: [PATCH 2/3] system: Add store-directory-prefix to boot-parameters.

2020-10-31 Thread Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas
I've pushed this last patch as 582cf9257cd1f9c969fbba5eb1c336ac8b975cde with the following additions: - A pointer to this issue in the commit message. - A description of store-directory-prefix on the commit message. - A better version (I hope) of the comment inside . Thank you very much! Miguel

bug#44196: [PATCH v6 3/4] system: Do not depend on locale folder generated by

2020-10-31 Thread Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas
¡Hola, Ludo! Thanks for your comments. Reviewing them I found some more issues that I address inline: Ludovic Courtès writes: > Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas skribis: > >> From 5886bdf74bda59649b3d17b691132d9d030e0fb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: =?UTF-8?q?Miguel=20=C3=81ngel=20Arruga=20Vivas

bug#44196: [PATCH 2/3] system: Add store-directory-prefix to boot-parameters.

2020-10-31 Thread Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas
Writing the last email I though about adding this: -- ;; OS's root file system, so it might be a device path like "/dev/sda3". + ;; The 'store-directory-prefix' field contains #f or the actual path of + ;; the store in

bug#44196: [PATCH 2/3] system: Add store-directory-prefix to boot-parameters.

2020-10-31 Thread Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas
Hi Ludo! First of all, thanks for the review. Ludovic Courtès writes: > Could you explain why we need ‘store-directory-prefix’ in addition to > ‘store-mount-point’? At first sight, looking at the fields in there, > these two can seem to be synonymous. The difference is subtle unless you use bt

bug#44261: running a daemon with userns in relocateble pack breaks

2020-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] >> The attached patch adds a test loosely based on yours and a fix for >> that. The fix (for the “userns” engine) is to make NEW_ROOT a tmpfs, >> such that upon completion, all we need to do is to unmount it and remove >> it; it l

bug#44196: [PATCH v6 3/4] system: Do not depend on locale folder generated by

2020-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
¡Hola! Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas skribis: > From 5886bdf74bda59649b3d17b691132d9d030e0fb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Miguel=20=C3=81ngel=20Arruga=20Vivas?= > > Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 20:36:21 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] system: Do not depend on locale folder generated by > grub-i

bug#44196: [PATCH 2/3] system: Add store-directory-prefix to boot-parameters.

2020-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas skribis: > From 527a9271122f7b83f31dc0b910c6704af81bde66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Miguel=20=C3=81ngel=20Arruga=20Vivas?= > > Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 18:15:53 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] system: Add store-directory-prefix to boot-parameters. > > *

bug#44301: Black screen in Guix System installation

2020-10-31 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 02:22:58PM +0100, soheilkhanalipur--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Guix has some incompatibilities like (issues.guix.gnu.org/43985) with my > computer. > What are these? what's the solution? Your issues are post-install, I think, so the installer worked properly,

bug#43296: [PATCH] gnu: Fix gnome-builder build.

2020-10-31 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:26:10PM +0200, Leo Prikler wrote: > As reported in #43296, gnome-builder tries to be linked against the static > version of libselinux (propagated through glib/gio), failing to do so, as it > also wants to be a PIE. To keep the PIE, link it against the dynamic library. >

bug#44353: guix system disk-image -t raw fails with grub-efi-bootloader

2020-10-31 Thread Jesse Gibbons
To replicate: cd to a git checkout of the source code, gnu/system/examples The hash for my current checkout is d7e033b9a153a9e60f52ff64f4eb355c1c3d0a6e which is also the hash for my current version of guix. guix system disk-image -t raw lightweight-desktop.tmpl lightweight-desktop.tmpl defines

bug#43879: Problem with graphical installer

2020-10-31 Thread Marinus Savoritias
On 10/31/20 1:04 PM, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas wrote: Hi, I CC the list, as we are currently on freeze, but this might require a fix or at least a big explanation somewhere, my bad for not answering soon enough. :-( Marinus Savoritias writes: Hi, The steps that I followed were: 1. Use gu

bug#44301: Black screen in Guix System installation

2020-10-31 Thread soheilkhanalipur--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Guix has some incompatibilities like (issues.guix.gnu.org/43985) with my computer. What are these? what's the solution?

bug#41205: make check stucks for hours

2020-10-31 Thread Wensheng Xie
Thanks for investigating. I will try to do it later. Please give me some time. On 2020/10/29 上午7:02, zimoun wrote: Dear, On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 19:07, Wensheng Xie wrote: 3. ./configure Here is missing the argument ’--localstatedir=/var/’. Could you add it and report if you still have the

bug#44347: mingetty --no-clear is hard-coded

2020-10-31 Thread Jesse Gibbons
The --no-clear option is hard-coded for mingetty, with no documentation about why. The mingetty page says,    --noclear   Do not clear the screen before prompting for the login name (the   screen is normally cleared). I do not think I am alone in preferring the scre

bug#43879: Problem with graphical installer

2020-10-31 Thread Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas
Hi, I CC the list, as we are currently on freeze, but this might require a fix or at least a big explanation somewhere, my bad for not answering soon enough. :-( Marinus Savoritias writes: > Hi, > > The steps that I followed were: > > 1. Use guided installation using full disk with graphical ins

bug#43893: [PATCH v3] maint: update-guix-package: Prevent accidentally breaking guix pull.

2020-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: >> +(define (assert-clean-checkout repository) >> + "Error out if the working directory at REPOSITORY contains local >> +modifications." >> + (define description >> +(let ((format-options (make-describe-format-options >> + #:dirt

bug#44327: `guix install` doesn't warn about collison in profile

2020-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
zimoun skribis: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Currently, ‘guix install’ errors out if you try to install two >> same-named packages with a different version number or a different store >> file name (typically via propagated inputs). >> >> Here, ‘emacs’ and ‘emacs-xw

bug#44254: Performance of package input rewriting

2020-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Lars, Lars-Dominik Braun skribis: >> Another thing to look at is the object graph (as show by ‘guix >> graph’). Input rewriting can duplicate parts of the graph, which in >> turn defeats package->derivation memoization. Just looking at the >> number of nodes in the graph can give hints. >