Hi, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] >> The attached patch adds a test loosely based on yours and a fix for >> that. The fix (for the “userns” engine) is to make NEW_ROOT a tmpfs, >> such that upon completion, all we need to do is to unmount it and remove >> it; it lives on as the root file system of child processes. >> >> In the “fakechroot” case, we have to leave NEW_ROOT behind, which is not >> great but acceptable (it’s user-owned, #o700, and it’s under /tmp). The >> test only checks the “userns” engine. > > Yes, I think this is acceptable. > >> If you confirm that it works for you and looks reasonable, we can apply >> it. > > Yes, this works. The test and also my reproducer now work fine. Thanks for checking, I pushed the fix as bfe82fe2f6e9f34c0774fe2114cdc7e937ba8bd2. Ludo’.
