bug#43855: gnu: python-shapely fails to build

2020-10-07 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 11:32:01PM +0200, Malte Frank Gerdes wrote: > Hi, > > python-shapely fails to build, because it can't find the c libary, > the package definition was not complete (patch at the end). > > Now the package finds a C libary but the Test Suite fails with the > follwoing error:

bug#43843: git-annex is not Reproducible

2020-10-07 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 11:04:13PM -0400, Kyle Meyer wrote: > On 10/07/20 12:35:51 +0200, zimoun wrote: > > Dear, > > > > Using Guix 04a459a, the package ’git-annex’ is not reproducible: > > > > guix build git-annex > > guix build git-annex --no-grafts --check -K > > > > return: > > > > --8<---

bug#43843: git-annex is not Reproducible

2020-10-07 Thread Kyle Meyer
On 10/07/20 12:35:51 +0200, zimoun wrote: > Dear, > > Using Guix 04a459a, the package ’git-annex’ is not reproducible: > > guix build git-annex > guix build git-annex --no-grafts --check -K > > return: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > guix build: error: de

bug#43802: Knot: Linker runs very slowly and crashes during build

2020-10-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Simon South skribis: >> What I didn't know was that these generated C files were included in >> the release tarball. We have the Ragel, we can rebuild them, and we >> now do so in commit 2b73e50c31a61b5dcef35a1e4b9484d9dbcb0fbc. > > Neat! +1, yay for bootstrapping! Ludo’.

bug#43855: gnu: python-shapely fails to build

2020-10-07 Thread Malte Frank Gerdes
Hi, python-shapely fails to build, because it can't find the c libary, the package definition was not complete (patch at the end). Now the package finds a C libary but the Test Suite fails with the follwoing error: --8<---cut here---start->8--- ===

bug#43779: tbb: test_global_control failure

2020-10-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Greg Hogan skribis: > I don’t see any build failures on ci.guix.gnu.org , > only two successes. Where is x86_64, should it not at least show as pending? > > Builds matching tbb-2020.3 > IDSpecification Completion time Job NameSystem Log > 3253827

bug#39834: make check fails

2020-10-07 Thread Damien Cassou
zimoun writes: > Have you succeed to pass ’make check’ at the end? What is the status? I gave up on Guix and moved back to Nix. Best -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

bug#43849: mesa is not reproducible

2020-10-07 Thread zimoun
Dear Danny, You asked on guix-devel since when Mesa is not reproducible: at least since v1.1.0. git --no-pager log v1.1.0 -1 --format='%H' d62c9b2671be55ae0305bebfda17b595f33797f2 guix time-machine --commit=d62c9b2671be55ae0305bebfda17b595f33797f2 \ -- build mesa guix time-machine

bug#43850: cuirass: inconsistent SQL queries execution time.

2020-10-07 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hello, Over the last few weeks I made sure that all Cuirass SQL queries were using indexes. As the "Builds" and "Outputs" tables can be really large, having queries covered by indexes is imperative for consistent queries duration. However, I observed that some queries have inconsistent duration

bug#39834: make check fails

2020-10-07 Thread zimoun
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 17:47, Damien Cassou wrote: > I gave up on Guix and moved back to Nix. Sad to read. Thank you for your feedback and bug report when you had used Guix. Since information is missing to debug, let's close. All the best, simon

bug#39834: make check fails

2020-10-07 Thread zimoun
Dear, On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 at 15:32, Damien Cassou wrote: >> Well, first about your "last" error: […] It comes from the >> environment variable SHELL which is not defined because of >> '--pure'. So you need somehow to export SHELL or CONFIG_SHELL >> otherwise, you will get an error from '(string

bug#43849: mesa is not reproducible

2020-10-07 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
--- /gnu/store/6l8s3qqvqwkp966j49v1sxw8v36mjjr6-mesa-20.1.9 +++ /gnu/store/6l8s3qqvqwkp966j49v1sxw8v36mjjr6-mesa-20.1.9-check ├── lib │ ├── dri │ │ ├── iris_dri.so │ │ │ ├── readelf --wide --dynamic {} │ │ │ │ @@ -1,27 +1,27 @@ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ Dynamic section at offset 0x1aaf9a0 contains 64 entr

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-10-07 Thread zimoun
Dear, On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > zimoun writes: >>> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. The packages: … >> - rapicorn >> - ganeti >> - manuskript >> - emacs-org-web-tools >> - emacs-ox-pandoc >> - ruby-pandoc-ruby … now uses ’pando

bug#43826: cuirass: build query is too slow.

2020-10-07 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
> All of this should be combined in a unique query to minimize > overhead. The limit should also by restricted to at most 1000 builds for > instance. Fixed with cb2c4e3d8f7eda187adf6da1fc35aef838c49828. Mathieu

bug#43843: git-annex is not Reproducible

2020-10-07 Thread zimoun
Dear, Using Guix 04a459a, the package ’git-annex’ is not reproducible: guix build git-annex guix build git-annex --no-grafts --check -K return: --8<---cut here---start->8--- guix build: error: derivation `/gnu/store/70qkv5hi5yq20m1h9jfm17m5lsc235mk-git-a