bug#43093: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-ess: Update to 20200903.1516.

2020-09-04 Thread Tim Howes via Bug reports for GNU Guix
* gnu/packages/statistics.scm (emacs-ess): Update to 20200903.1516. [version]: Use latest commit, assign version based on commit date. [source]: Fix snippet for removing julia-mode. Remove snippet to modify roxy-preview-Rd-test. Add snippet to modify r-help-mode test. Add snippet to fix install

bug#35210: Error building linux-libre on Overdrive 1000

2020-09-04 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:37:29PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Andreas Enge wrote: > > I confirm after just trying to reconfigure, with commit > > 36dbad3858ca4229e9ec319bd4983fca7835067d. > > Cc-ing the bug tracker. > Thanks! I wasn't expecting to hit an ‘actual’ bug. Yaay. I

bug#42575: Missing icons in i3

2020-09-04 Thread raingloom
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:28:33 +0200 Jonathan Brielmaier wrote: > If some one has an idea how to debug that I would be happy. > > I tried `strace -f` and looked around at all those icon places, but I > can't find something suspicious. > > My theory is that when clicking `mate-appearance-propertie

bug#43093: emacs-ess is broken by emacs 27.1

2020-09-04 Thread Tim Howes via Bug reports for GNU Guix
On 8/28/2020 1:07 PM, divoplade wrote: Hello all, Right now emacs-ess is broken so I cannot upgrade to emacs 27. The failing test is "test-ess-roxy-literate". Thank you anyway, I cannot wait to have emacs 27! divoplade Hello, I think, instead of disabling the test or trying to make it w

bug#43093: Is Emacs 27.1 that breaks emacs-ess?

2020-09-04 Thread zimoun
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 17:26, divoplade wrote: > Well, you must be right. I did not think it out long enough. It broke > at the same time I saw the emacs update, so I inferred it incorrectly. Nonetheless, it is still annoying. :-) > > Note that the parent commit c05d2cfcbd builds successfully on

bug#43093: Is Emacs 27.1 that breaks emacs-ess?

2020-09-04 Thread Mark H Weaver
divoplade writes: > Is it possible to edit the title? Yes. To do so, send an email to 'cont...@debbugs.gnu.org' with the following two-line body: --8<---cut here---start->8--- retitle 43093 THE_NEW_BUG_TITLE_GOES_HERE thanks --8<---cut here---

bug#43093: Is Emacs 27.1 that breaks emacs-ess?

2020-09-04 Thread divoplade
Hello, Le vendredi 04 septembre 2020 à 16:44 +0200, zimoun a écrit : > But the commit 36a09d1853 introducing Emacs 27 had been pushed on Fri > Aug 28 > 00:13:51 2020 -0400 and the CI reported failures before this > offending > commit. > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=spec%3Aguix-master+sys

bug#43093: Is Emacs 27.1 that breaks emacs-ess?

2020-09-04 Thread zimoun
Dear, On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 22:07, divoplade wrote: > Right now emacs-ess is broken so I cannot upgrade to emacs 27. The > failing test is "test-ess-roxy-literate". I confirm. --8<---cut here---start->8--- guix time-machine --commit=36a09d1853 \ -- bui

bug#43138: Stack overflow in emacs 27 because of preloading emacs-seq

2020-09-04 Thread Mark H Weaver
Pierre Langlois writes: > Replying with the bug on CC, I didn't realise your last email didn't > include it. I assume that was a mistake? Indeed, my mistake. I just resent my previous email to complete the record for this bug. > OK, pushed to master with 852ae64e11ef9107afabbdb307770f946376addd

bug#43138: Stack overflow in emacs 27 because of preloading emacs-seq

2020-09-04 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Pierre, Pierre Langlois writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> If 'emacs-seq' is included in Emacs 27, it seems to me that we should >> just delete it, unless there's something I'm missing. > > Agreed, I was curious if there was another reason for needing it, since > I /believe/ it's been in em

bug#43138: Stack overflow in emacs 27 because of preloading emacs-seq

2020-09-04 Thread Pierre Langlois
Hi Mark, Replying with the bug on CC, I didn't realise your last email didn't include it. I assume that was a mistake? Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Pierre, > > Pierre Langlois writes: > >> Mark H Weaver writes: >> >>> If 'emacs-seq' is included in Emacs 27, it seems to me that we should >>> just