bug#24069: [PATCHv3] Re: bug#24069: gcc man page is broken

2017-10-02 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Patch v3 still doesn't fix the problem. There are now pod2man errors that prevent correctly generating the man pages: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Makefile:3076: update target 'gcc.pod' due to: ../../gcc-5.4.0/gcc/doc/invoke.texi ../../gcc-5.4.0/gcc/doc/cppenv

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Leo Famulari skribis: >> >> > I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that: >> > >> > 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they >> > generate

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Hmm. I'm not sure what problem we are solving. Should we only do this > for github(-like) tarballs? Do we see this problem with other sources, > should we prevent it? Possibly github will never do something like this > again.

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Right. Jan suggested checking the content-addressed mirrors *before* > the real upstream address. That would address the problem of upstream > sources modified in-place, but at the cost of privacy/self-sufficiency > as you note. (Though it’s not really making “privacy”

bug#24069: [PATCHv2] Re: bug#24069: gcc man page is broken

2017-10-02 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hello, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> I believe this would cause gcc-5 to be rebuilt, which would cause a >> world rebuild, so for the moment we also need a native-inputs entry for >> gcc-5 making sure that nothing changes, ie: that we're only using >> tex

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 05:09:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at: >> >> >> https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s Just to be clear:

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 05:09:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at: > > > https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s It seems to me that there are several reasons so

bug#24445: GNOME desktop session crash when re-arranging dock

2017-10-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mohammed Sadiq skribis: > >> This crash appears to happen on dragging anything on gnome-shell. >> >> Eg: >> 1. If a window is dragged in shell overview >> 2. if a window in desktop list (in the right side) is dragged. >> 3. if some icon from Application li

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that: > > > > 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they > > generate automatically for each release ta

bug#24445: GNOME desktop session crash when re-arranging dock

2017-10-02 Thread Mohammed Sadiq
> On October 2, 2017 at 8:21 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Mohammed, do you think this could be Guix-specific? Intuitively I would > guess that this can only be an upstream bug, but you know GNOME better > than I do. :-) But I don't know gnome-shell any better than you. :) This doesn't happen i

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: > What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at: > > > https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s Sad indeed! > The problem is that the hash check is performed by guix-daemon itself, > n

bug#28664: gst-plugins-base-1.12.3.tar.xz nar on berlin returns 404

2017-10-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > Downloading > https://berlin.guixsd.org/nar/g2ph0s1bjnzzn3q3h2pb8zw87bdxf697-gst-plugins-base-1.12.3.tar.xz... > guix substitute: error: download from > 'https://berlin.guixsd.org/nar/g2ph0s1bjnzzn3q3h2pb8zw87bdxf697-gst-plugins-base-1.12.3.tar.xz' > fa

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > As reported by laertus on irc[0]: guix pull on 0.13 without substitutes fails I just checked and we do have substitutes, but I understand it doesn’t help here. > guix pull > > Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.3r6cH0 > From https://git.savann

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Leo Famulari skribis: > I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that: > > 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they > generate automatically for each release tag, and they wish that people > would not rely on them as we do. However, since pe

bug#24069: [PATCHv2] Re: bug#24069: gcc man page is broken

2017-10-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Efraim Flashner skribis: > I believe this would cause gcc-5 to be rebuilt, which would cause a > world rebuild, so for the moment we also need a native-inputs entry for > gcc-5 making sure that nothing changes, ie: that we're only using > texinfo there, preferably with a note that it should be ch

bug#24445: GNOME desktop session crash when re-arranging dock

2017-10-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mohammed Sadiq skribis: > This crash appears to happen on dragging anything on gnome-shell. > > Eg: > 1. If a window is dragged in shell overview > 2. if a window in desktop list (in the right side) is dragged. > 3. if some icon from Application list is dragged. > > Also, the immediately followed

bug#24069: [PATCHv2] Re: bug#24069: gcc man page is broken

2017-10-02 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:54:56AM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Version 2. > > Removes the unnecessary (ice-9 match) use clause I added while > experimenting. > > From a044901c0fc51571b8ed6809080029b8701b09e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Maxim Cournoyer > Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 09:27:31 -

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

2017-10-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
ng0 skribis: > I wasn't able to make use of the guix build -f build.scm > for my adaption of its code base > but haunt build on its own worked. The build.scm was > complaining about this: Yep, you even opened a bug about it. :-) For now I suggest using “haunt build”. Ludo’.

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

2017-10-02 Thread ng0
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.2K bytes: > Hello ng0, > > ng0 skribis: > > > what's missing for this branch to be merged? I took a quick build on this > > (and because I like the code as a reference), and it looks good. Builds, > > maybe some changes from master have to be applied to it (like usi

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

2017-10-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello ng0, ng0 skribis: > what's missing for this branch to be merged? I took a quick build on this > (and because I like the code as a reference), and it looks good. Builds, > maybe some changes from master have to be applied to it (like using > https instead of http at the download URLs). > >