Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> skribis: > I believe this would cause gcc-5 to be rebuilt, which would cause a > world rebuild, so for the moment we also need a native-inputs entry for > gcc-5 making sure that nothing changes, ie: that we're only using > texinfo there, preferably with a note that it should be changed in the > future. Also, you should take a look at gnu/packages/commencement and > make sure that we're not adding perl as a native-input for gcc-boot0 or > for libstdc++, wherever that happens to live (I don't remember off > hand).
I think this should go to ‘core-updates’. > I assume it is OK for us to build the man pages for gcc-final (if it > happens) since this is the gcc used for actually building packages, and > I believe the one pulled in for gcc-toolchain. More precisely, building man pages for ‘gcc-boot0’ is pointless and possibly adds Perl on the graph for no good reason. So if we can arrange to just have man pages in ‘gcc-final’, we’re good. Efraim, could you check whether that works for ‘core-updates’? Thanks, Ludo’.
