> Like this: (system* "python" "setup.py" "install").
Could you elaborate?
I tried several things, but none of them worked.
Nikita
pgpX7LvqCgxsb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 01/18/2013 10:53 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
Hello,
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 schrieb Cyril Roelandt:
This patch adds vim (Vi IMproved), a very popular text editor based on
vi, to the packages.
the recipe works well for me, thanks!
I did not specify a license, since vim uses a weird Charit
On 01/18/2013 10:45 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hey!
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
This patch adds vim (Vi IMproved), a very popular text editor based on
vi, to the packages.
I did not specify a license, since vim uses a weird Charityware
license; is that OK ?
No. :-)
Can you please add it to g
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> ;; Announcement. -*- scheme -*-
>
> (define guix
> (package
> (name "guix")
> (version "0.1") ; first alpha release
> (source
> (origin
> (method url-fetch)
>
Hello,
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 schrieb Cyril Roelandt:
> This patch adds vim (Vi IMproved), a very popular text editor based on
> vi, to the packages.
the recipe works well for me, thanks!
> I did not specify a license, since vim uses a weird Charityware license;
> is that OK ?
The FSF refe
Hey!
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> This patch adds vim (Vi IMproved), a very popular text editor based on
> vi, to the packages.
>
> I did not specify a license, since vim uses a weird Charityware
> license; is that OK ?
No. :-)
Can you please add it to guix/licenses.scm, using
http://www.gnu.org
This patch adds vim (Vi IMproved), a very popular text editor based on
vi, to the packages.
I did not specify a license, since vim uses a weird Charityware license;
is that OK ?
WBR,
Cyril Roelandt.
>From 24d99e9b2da17d8c34014152bcaae47dc2bcd9f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyril Roelandt
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> That is what I do. But I am not fond of pushing packages for which I
>> would still like to add more inputs; it is possible to push
>> libextractor without lots of optional dependencies. This is what my
>> proposed patch for vorbis-tools does, there is a FIXME explai
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 schrieb Nikita Karetnikov:
> > If you are okay with it, Nikita, I would then push my oggvorbis
> > package, after adding a dependency on speex to vorbis-tools.
>
> Could you push 'oggvorbis' first? Then I'll push 'speex'.
Okay, done, thanks!
> By the way, should I us
>> Another thing we can do to avoid duplicated work, is to commit and push
>> individual packages as soon as we have them. For instance, as soon as
>> you have a working libextractor, go ahead and push it.
Sounds good.
> That is what I do. But I am not fond of pushing packages for which I
> would
> If you are okay with it, Nikita, I would then push my oggvorbis
> package, after adding a dependency on speex to vorbis-tools.
Could you push 'oggvorbis' first? Then I'll push 'speex'. And you'll
be able to update 'oggvorbis'.
By the way, should I use a separate file for GNU Speex? Would it
> So this is not precisely the original BSD-3 license, which does not mention
> Xiph.
> What is our policy here?
You're right. 'bsd-style' should be used.
> So I would suggest the following more comprehensive patch.
Please push it.
Nikita
pgpT4Jz9tykTH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello!
Looking into more details, given that Andreas’s patch adds more stuff,
I think it would be wise to commit this one. WDYT?
And presumably, Andreas should get the lock on all things Xiph-related.
:-)
Ludo’.
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> > From eaac22aaf385e846bbf207886498302405f91208 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Nikita Karetnikov
> > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 02:06:35 +
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Speex.
> > * gnu/packages/speex.scm:
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Another thing we can do to avoid duplicated work, is to commit and push
> individual packages as soon as we have them. For instance, as soon as
> you have a working libextractor, go ahead and push it.
That is what I do. But I am not fond of p
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> From 1691be7ff5f0484d503eeb5016d2e0c77c4f0afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nikita Karetnikov
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:27:06 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ddrescue: Fix 'synopsis' and 'description'.
>
> * gnu/packages/ddrescue.scm (ddrescue): Fix 'synopsis' and
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> I'm packaging GNU Bazaar. Unfortunately, it doesn't support the GNU
> build system.
Yeah, among other things...
> 'INSTALL' contains the following instructions:
>
> When upgrading using setup.py, it is recommended that you first delete the
> bzrlib directory from t
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> From eaac22aaf385e846bbf207886498302405f91208 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nikita Karetnikov
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 02:06:35 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Speex.
>
> * gnu/packages/speex.scm: New file.
> * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it.
Looks good to m
Hi!
Andreas Enge skribis:
> So maybe to avoid working on the same things, I currently have gnunet,
> libextractor, flac (with a patch), curl, groff, netpbm, openldap and
> ghostscript in my pipeline. These are all dependencies in one way or
> another of gnunet. But I think it could take quite
So maybe to avoid working on the same things, I currently have gnunet,
libextractor, flac (with a patch), curl, groff, netpbm, openldap and
ghostscript in my pipeline. These are all dependencies in one way or
another of gnunet. But I think it could take quite a while until I arrive
at the top o
Hello,
I prepared the same, but did not push it yet. Actually, I wanted to package
the vorbis-tools, and got sucked into a dependency chain that started with
curl and currently ends with ghostscript...
> +(inputs `(("xz" ,xz)))
You do not need this; it is only used for unpacking, which is
;; Announcement. -*- scheme -*-
(define guix
(package
(name "guix")
(version "0.1") ; first alpha release
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri "ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-0.1.tar.gz"
Hi!
We did it! ;-) Congratulations, and special thanks to you, Nikita and
Andreas, for your hard work and for your confidence.
Ludo’.
pgpFp6LrlTeRS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
23 matches
Mail list logo