Nikita Karetnikov <nik...@karetnikov.org> skribis: >> That is what I do. But I am not fond of pushing packages for which I >> would still like to add more inputs; it is possible to push >> libextractor without lots of optional dependencies. This is what my >> proposed patch for vorbis-tools does, there is a FIXME explaining >> which inputs are missing. But then there is a higher risk of >> forgetting to add them. > > I suggest to announce such things on the list.
Yes, but that’s inconvenient. Typically, I’m likely to have forgotten what others are doing by the time I actually start packaging something. ;-) >>> Or maybe we should use an Org file somewhere, or a wiki, or some sort of >>> locally-hosted Web 2.0 task management thing. > > Can Savannah be used? Could be, though it’s really inconvenient (heavyweight, browser-only). >> Anything would be fine for me as long as it is easy. Maybe a wiki >> would be easiest for the time being. > > I guess that the easiest thing is to stick with this list. You mean this /mailing/ list? Ludo’.
