bug#73605: [PATCH] Replace SRFI-64 with a new implementation.

Hi Tomas, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis: > The bundled (reference) implementation was of somewhat mixed quality and > it failed to follow standard in multiple places. This commit replaces > it with a new one, written from scratch to follow the standard as close > as possible. > > * module/s

bug#73188: PEG parser does not support full PEG grammar

Hi Ekaitz, Ekaitz Zarraga skribis: > This commit adds support for PEG as described in: > > I would make this a comment below the ‘define-module’ form. > It adds support for the missing features (comments, underscores in > identifiers and escaping) whil

bug#73188: PEG parser does not support full PEG grammar

Saluton Ludovic, On 2024-10-13 22:29, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi Ekaitz, Ekaitz Zarraga skribis: This commit adds support for PEG as described in: I would make this a comment below the ‘define-module’ form. Okay I will add it. It adds support

bug#73787: Typo in manual: Missing parentheses in SRFI-1

Hello, In the first code block of Section 7.5.3.5 "Fold, Unfold & Map" of the Guile Manual, the last call to `cons' is missing a parentheses: (cons 3 '(2 1) Should be: (cons 3 '(2 1)) Thanks. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#73787: [patch]: bug#73787: Typo in manual: Missing parentheses in SRFI-1

8dcc <8dcc@gmail.com> writes: > (cons 3 '(2 1) > > Should be: > > (cons 3 '(2 1)) Thank you for the bug report! I attached a fix: From 206ebc461a5ecc9a44143d43daf6f1ec5c0680b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arne Babenhauserheide Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 14:57:30 +0200 Subject: [PATCH]