On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
Hi Tomas,
Thanks for stress-testing the SRFI 64 spec & implementation and reporting all
these discrepancies. :-)
Firstly, to reiterate some things I've already mentioned in
On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> The specification says the following about the count argument to the
> test-begin
> form:
>
>> The optional count must match the number of test-cases executed by this
>> g
On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> The specification says the following about the test-end:
>
>> An error is reported if the suite-name does not match the current test group
>> name.
> Thus the following sho
On 29.09.2024 21:43, Maxime Devos via Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous
Extension Language wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Based on this I believe it describes the specification.
>
> >
>
> >That's correct. It's been slightly modified in places where it said
>
> >things like "left to the implementation"
Found two more typos today:
>From 0c090dcfe3b156436f35b52e4492575b71cf621f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Kaak
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:10:43 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed a couple typos in the documentation
* doc/ref/apu-scheduling.texi: Fixed one typo of "if" from "ff"
* doc/ref/apu-u
On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> The specification says the following regarding the test-runner-test-name:
>
>> Returns the name of the current test or test group, as a string. During
>> execution of test-
On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> The specification describes the on-bad-end-name-function like this:
>
> (on-bad-end-name-function runner begin-name end-name)
>
> Thus the following should print `x':
>
On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> The specification says the following regarding the test-apply:
>
>> If one or more specifiers are listed then only tests matching the specifiers
>> are executed.
> That imp