Found two more typos today: >From 0c090dcfe3b156436f35b52e4492575b71cf621f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Kaak <zvavy...@zvavybir.eu> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:10:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed a couple typos in the documentation
* doc/ref/apu-scheduling.texi: Fixed one typo of "if" from "ff" * doc/ref/apu-undocumented.texi: Fixed one typo of "if" from "ff" Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaak <zvavy...@zvavybir.eu> --- doc/ref/api-scheduling.texi | 2 +- doc/ref/api-undocumented.texi | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/ref/api-scheduling.texi b/doc/ref/api-scheduling.texi index d79808049..af95ead39 100644 --- a/doc/ref/api-scheduling.texi +++ b/doc/ref/api-scheduling.texi @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Once @var{body} or @var{handler} returns, the return value is made the @deffn {Scheme Procedure} thread? obj @deffnx {C Function} scm_thread_p (obj) -Return @code{#t} ff @var{obj} is a thread; otherwise, return +Return @code{#t} if @var{obj} is a thread; otherwise, return @code{#f}. @end deffn diff --git a/doc/ref/api-undocumented.texi b/doc/ref/api-undocumented.texi index 2967c95f4..63491c9fb 100644 --- a/doc/ref/api-undocumented.texi +++ b/doc/ref/api-undocumented.texi @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ they are printed in turn, each one followed by a newline. @deffn {Scheme Procedure} valid-object-procedure? proc @deffnx {C Function} scm_valid_object_procedure_p (proc) -Return @code{#t} ff @var{proc} is a procedure that can be used with @code{set-object-procedure}. It is always valid to use a closure constructed by @code{lambda}. +Return @code{#t} if @var{proc} is a procedure that can be used with @code{set-object-procedure}. It is always valid to use a closure constructed by @code{lambda}. @end deffn @deffn {Scheme Procedure} %get-pre-modules-obarray -- 2.45.2