Hi,
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So ideally instead of documenting them, if you're with me, we should
> deprecate them, replacing them with their srfi-1 counterparts.
I'm with you, but I think the status quo is safer, so that code from the
late 90's can run forever with Guile (hmm, h
From a user's perspective, reading code containing these functions, it can
be confusing that they're undocumented and not defined in the user portion
of the code. Either deprecating them or documenting them with the caveats
mentioned would be better than the status quo.
I would prefer to docu
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès):
> Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So ideally instead of documenting them, if you're with me, we should
>> deprecate them, replacing them with their srfi-1 counterparts.
>
> I'm with you, but I think the status quo is safer, so that code from th
Hello,
szgyg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, (read) should return mutable string.
I reverted the patch and added a new test case in `readers.test'.
Thanks,
Ludo'.