Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès):
> Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So ideally instead of documenting them, if you're with me, we should
>> deprecate them, replacing them with their srfi-1 counterparts.
>
> I'm with you, but I think the status quo is safer, so that code from the
> late 90's can run forever with Guile (hmm, how convincing is that?).
How about deprecating them in the documentation only.
Dare I say that if it exists, it should be documented, (if only to
direct the user elsewhere).
Something like this maybe:
-- Scheme Procedure: and-map pred lst1 lst2 ... lstN
Please see <info-xref to 'every'>.
Note: The reason for having two procedures that do the same thing is
primarily historical. 'and-map' only exists in Guile whereas
'every' can be found in most (if not all) Scheme
implementations. It will not be removed (for the sake of
backwards compatiblity) but there's no reason to use it unless
you want your code to be non-portable.
Seb
