On Wed 19 Apr 2017 18:11, Zefram writes:
> Andy Wingo wrote:
>>This makes sense to me, FWIW.
>
> Patch attached.
Thank you! Applied. I adapted the change log message to follow Guile
conventions; it was:
> From 444703940983d559935c4dd2a2c89d7888c67119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zefram
>
Andy Wingo wrote:
>This makes sense to me, FWIW.
Patch attached.
-zefram
>From 444703940983d559935c4dd2a2c89d7888c67119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zefram
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:08:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] correct note about Gregorian reform in SRFI-19
SRFI-19 specifies proleptic use of
On Sat 18 Mar 2017 00:53, Zefram writes:
> The documentation, near the start of the section on SRFI-19, says
>
> !*Caution*: The current code in this module incorrectly extends the
> ! Gregorian calendar leap year rule back prior to the introduction of
> ! those reforms in 1582 (or the approp
The documentation, near the start of the section on SRFI-19, says
!*Caution*: The current code in this module incorrectly extends the
! Gregorian calendar leap year rule back prior to the introduction of
! those reforms in 1582 (or the appropriate year in various countries).
! The Julian calen
