bug#15370: weirdness w/ uniform-vector-read! compat

se) input, so i think this situation is a regression. Am i missing something? -- Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) => nil pgpIP6V3o_U0U.pgp Description: PGP signature

bug#14128: web/http.scm: bad-header date check (UTC?)

learn how and when to say "no". -- Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 pgp8YeIY0NhOd.pgp Description: PGP signature

bug#12892: ‘gc-stats’ w/o ‘bytes-malloced’

() Andy Wingo () Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:21:53 +0100 [...] Dunno. As an experiment, i've changed the cc to bug-guile in this response. Maybe that will work. Anyway, i'll followup w/ the debbugs folks. -- Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502

bug#12892: ‘gc-stats’ w/o ‘bytes-malloced’

ts) 'bytes-malloced)) in test/leak.scm. A related issue is how the error is reported. It seems strange that the file is "unknown". -- Thien-Thi Nguyen . GPG key: 4C807502 . NB: ttn at glug dot org is not me . .

Re: [Bug-autogen] test failure with guile-2.0.2

() Thien-Thi Nguyen () Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:01:17 +0200 Try to jump up and see things from a perspective that includes the motion of the people who follow the leader. That will make you a better leader. A little bird had two things to say to me: - that was a pretty wise-ass way to say

Re: [Bug-autogen] test failure with guile-2.0.2

() Andy Wingo () Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:41:42 +0200 I realize that this is irritating to you, but it is the right thing, improves the situation for loads of users, and is largely compatible. I think when you say "it is the right thing", you are missing the point. Try to jump up and see things

Re: Typos in the manual

() Mark Harig () Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:03:39 -0500 (Why do they miss the large similarities but see the small differences?) This is a human condition that afflicts even programmers.

[bug #30167] libguile/Makefile.am ugly

Update of bug #30167 (project guile): Summary: func-name (#define FUNC_NAME) check not applied fully => libguile/Makefile.am ugly ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Actually, both those files are indeed checked, so this is really

[bug #30167] func-name (#define FUNC_NAME) check not applied fully

URL: Summary: func-name (#define FUNC_NAME) check not applied fully Project: Guile Submitted by: ttn Submitted on: gio 17 giu 2010 14:42:17 CEST Category: None Severit

Re: make-glil-local ?

() Neil Jerram () Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:07 + I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. "correct" would mean that the bug, and hence the fix needed, is in the code that the warning is pointing to. As opposed to the warning-generation code itself being bugged. OK, that's what i sus

Re: make-glil-local ?

() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100 > Is the warning correct? Of course it is! :-) I don't understand the question or the answer. (That is, what does "correct" mean?) Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way? thi

Re: libguile/read.c warning

() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:26:49 +0100 Which platform & compiler? $ uname -a Linux ambire 2.6.18-6-k7 #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 16:59:00 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21) Inspection shows that (at least, as of

libguile/read.c warning

../../GG/libguile/read.c: In function 'scm_read_expression': ../../GG/libguile/read.c:893: warning: 'charname' may be used uninitialized in this function

make-glil-local ?

There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local' in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't find that symbol anywhere... (This is from a "make clean ; make", but i unfortunately deleted the *Compilation* buffer.) thi

Re: [PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars.

() Andy Wingo () Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:06:23 +0100 Yes I tried that one, but it did the wrong thing. How about `gnus-summary-pipe-output'? thi

Re: [PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars.

() Andy Wingo () Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:52:08 +0100 I figured out how to use shell-command-on-region, M-|, so I don't care any more about whether there's comments before or after, though Ludovic is probably right about where they should go. So submit as you like. See also `gnus-summary-

Re: [PATCH] Fix bug: Init auto var to unrandomize `stack_depth' rv.

() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:02:47 +0100 I would advise adding explanatory comments in the code, rather than in the log. Good point. Will keep it in mind. thi

[PATCH] Use `mkstemp' instead of `mktemp'.

>From 030349a79946f992eb2bd58653c39321e9794e95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:49:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Use `mkstemp' instead of `mktemp'. * test-suite/standalone/test-unwind.c (check_ports): Use `mkstemp' instead of `mktemp'

Re: [PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars.

>From eb2713038b601abd59fdf377847510f27fd17e83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:07:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars. * README: Don't suggest setting vars before running configure. Instead, suggest sp

Re: [PATCH] Declare `GC_dump' ourselves if doesn't.

() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:19:44 +0100 > | dnl See note for PKG_CHECK_MODULES in aclocal.m4. > | PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG > | if test "$BDW_GC_CFLAGS" || test "$BDW_GC_LIBS" ; then : > | dnl We don't need to declare those env vars precious; > | dnl PKG_C

Re: [PATCH] Declare `GC_dump' ourselves if doesn't.

() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:17:06 +0100 So how did ‘configure’ find your libgc? I've modified configure.ac (see "Don't clobber..." patch) to look like: | dnl See note for PKG_CHECK_MODULES in aclocal.m4. | PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG | if test "$BDW_GC_CFLAGS" || test "$B

Re: [PATCH] Declare `GC_dump' ourselves if doesn't.

() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:09:15 +0100 Andy Wingo writes: > On Sat 09 Jan 2010 14:28, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > >> +# `GC_dump' is available in GC 6.8 but not declared. > > Neil, you also compile with pre-7.x, no? Do

Re: [PATCH] Declare `GC_dump' ourselves if doesn't.

() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:32:57 +0100 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Guile doesn’t requires 7.x (the ‘README’ file says so.) I meant “Guile requires 7.x”. Hmm, requiring versions is not the Autoconf Way. What feature / interface elements of lib

Re: [PATCH] Fix bug: Init auto var to unrandomize `stack_depth' rv.

() Andy Wingo () Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:29:34 +0100 Applied, along with some other patches. Cool, thanks. If you're going to send patches like this, I'm very happy to apply them; but it would be easier for me if you just sent the messages produced by git-format-patch, so I could just p

Re: [PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars.

() Andy Wingo () Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:31:55 +0100 > .pc file, you can work around this by setting some environment > -variables before running ./configure: > +as part of the configure command-line: Can you fix this one and resend? Yes, if you can tell me what's wrong w/

[PATCH] Fix bug: Don't clobber `PKG_CONFIG' when overriding pkg-config search for bdw-gw.

rom d6d765a2fcb0354146be6492a1212d5ad45fa385 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 22:40:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix bug: Don't clobber `PKG_CONFIG' when overriding pkg-config search for bdw-gw. * configure.ac (PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG): New top-level call.

[PATCH] Fix bug: Use correct `FUNC_NAME' for `scm_macro_binding'.

Basta con la copy pasta! (Enough of the copy/paste errors! ;-D) thi _ >From bf621def5b353221f486fe3a7c369120ba5a0c57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:09:15 +0100 Subject: [PA

[PATCH] Add cast in `make_vm' to silence compiler warning.

As advertized... thi ___ >From e08a92c5f21bab837ab051f5f1866cd066938262 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:05:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add cast in `make_vm' to silence compiler

[PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars.

_ >From 7a7b846cc2eb1f6aadfb06ccb445642f2bc2dfa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:07:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars. * README: Don't suggest setting vars before running configure. Instead, suggest specifying them on the

[PATCH] Declare `GC_dump' ourselves if doesn't.

This patch removes a harmless but annoying warning. thi ___ >From 39fd870610ff2cc1177e0cd0aba845806f0213c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 14:17:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Decl

[PATCH] Fix bug: Init auto var to unrandomize `stack_depth' rv.

Below is a revised patch, with updated ChangeLog entry (includes "libguile/" prefix). thi >From 666e9de72a7dbaff3ee67a77b3efc981b33c44eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Sat, 9 Jan

[PATCH] Fix bug: Init auto var to unrandomize `stack_depth' rv.

po write privs? thi ___ Fix bug: Init auto var to unrandomize `stack_depth' rv. * stacks.c (stack_depth): Init `n'. Signed-off-by: Thien-Thi Nguyen --- libguile/stacks.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+)

Re: Guile 1.9: bug in load

() Andy Wingo () Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:23:07 +0100 However the use case is important. We need to implement a (current-file) macro, I think, which should allow for file-relative loads. Is `current-load-port' still around for official Guile? If so, (define (current-file) (port-filename (cur

Re: guile 1.9.0 scm_read_hash_extend gc trouble

() "Bill Schottstaedt" () Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:10:09 -0700 code to implement #|..|# block comment processing triggers either a glibc memory complaint or a segfault. FWIW, below is the implementation from Guile 1.4.1.118 (not yet released). It handles nesting (per R6RS, i believe) and a weir

Re: string-ci* oddity

FYI, below is the code that all ci comparison funcs will be using in the next Guile 1.4.x release. This means, for example: (char-ci #f. thi ___ // libguile/chars.c #define ISLOWER(c) (islower (c) ? (1 + c - 'a') : 0) #define ISU

Re: string-ci* oddity

() "Bill Schottstaedt" () Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:55:21 -0800 Why do both Guile and Gauche give this result in string-ci

[patch] maintain output column

before, we see: (guile-user) (port-column (current-output-port)) 13 after, we see: (guile-user) (port-column (current-output-port)) 0 here is the ChangeLog entry for guile 1.4.x: 2007-11-13 Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * running-repls.scm (scm-style-repl consume-tr

Re: Need to include autoconf.texi into Ref Manual guile.texi

() [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) () Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:58:49 +0200 I'd like to know what others think. i think by end of 2007 we should aim to merge guile 1.4.x niceties (including autofrisk and other reflective and otherwise things) into guile HEAD, assuming there is some aligned inter

Re: [bug #20056] guile 1.8.1 regular expressions die on #nul (character zero) in operand

() Gregory Marton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> () Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:29:35 + This used to work in guile 1.3.4 but I haven't checked the versions in between. data point: guile> (version) "1.4.1.107.9.0.7" guile> (regexp-exec (make-regexp ".") (string #\nul)) #f thi _

Re: guile-www 1.1.1 & 2.16 problems under guile 1.8.

() [EMAIL PROTECTED] (r. clayton) () 11 May 2007 19:25:51 -0400 I downloaded 2.16 and 2.18 and both installed correctly. i'm glad to hear that. (let's hope next release maintains this property. :-) thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org

Re: guile-www 1.1.1 & 2.16 problems under guile 1.8.

() [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) () Fri, 11 May 2007 16:43:09 +0200 Nice that it can detect such things and adapt! that's the theory, anyway. However, the `s/make-shared-substring/substring/' occurs only at module-installation time, which precludes one from running the examples

Re: guile-www 1.1.1 & 2.16 problems under guile 1.8.

() [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) () Fri, 11 May 2007 09:16:31 +0200 So your fix seems reasonable, _provided_ `guile-www' doesn't rely on string mutations and interactions between substrings and their parent string. the easy way is to use configure script option --disable-shsub. i

Re: Failure while building Guile-SDL 0.3.6.

ou should direct this question to its maintainer, Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (not sure whether he reads this list). the error seemed to emanate from __scm.h. unfortunately, the grep output was not useful to figure out the nature of the problem. perhaps "grep -C 10"

Re: guile 1.4 compilation error with gcc4

From: Aaron Voisine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 14:38:16 -0700 scm_make_gsubr (s_ ## scm_acons, 3, 0, 0, (SCM (*)()) scm_acons); configure options as follows: export LIBRARY_PATH=/sw/lib export CPPFLAGS=-no-cpp-precomp export CPATH=/sw/include ./config

Re: guile 1.4 compilation error with gcc4

From: Aaron Voisine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:42:59 -0700 I'm trying to compile guile 1.4 with apple's gcc 4.0.0 (from xcode tools 2.2 preview 1) and I get the following compilation error: [...] ../libguile/alist.x:5: error: stray '##' in program looking

Re: guile-www-2.9 (www cgi) Tests for query-string parsing

From: Alan Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:16:26 -0400 This script [...] thanks for posting this. i have touched it up a bit (attached), and used it to verify operation of recently installed changes to cgi.scm (available, along w/ other changes, from cvs). the "not

Re: guile-www uses obsolete optargs-kw

From: Alan Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:45:23 -0400 It appears that module (ice-9 optargs-kw) is renamed (ice-9 optargs) in guile 1.6.4? originally, (ice-9 optargs) used #& style keywords. at some point, someone changed it to use #: style keywords, which broke

Re: guile-www-2.9 (www cgi) does not support mod-lisp/fastcgi style uses

From: Alan Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:44:37 -0400 [patch] I'm working on a suggested change to (www cgi) that will include this patch. It should be available within the next 2 days. i've just installed changes to the env var support. the gist is that

Re: guile-www-2.9 (www cgi) names in query-string not url-decoded

From: Alan Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:10:24 -0400 cgi.scm 286c286 < (and p (subs pair 0 p --- > (and p (url-coding:decode (subs pair 0 p) thanks, installed. here is the ChangeLog entry i used: 2005-04-12 Alan Grover <[EMAIL

Re: Bug in http module of guile-www

From: Robert Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:38:17 +0800 I happened accross a bug in the HTTP module of guile-www which seemed to trigger when I visited a page which gave no headers and just whitespace in the body. In such a case the variable "second" of parse-s

Re: fink guile make error

From: Chris Beamis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:28:16 -0800 [...] ld: warning -dylib_install_name /sw/lib/libguile.9.dylib not found in segment address table LD_SEG_ADDR_TABLE /sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/seg_addr_table ld: warning -undefined suppress disables -

Re: substantial performance loss when running long-lived or computationally intensive programs

From: "Michael A. Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 22:36:26 -0500 (CDT) Although this problem is present in Guile-1.6.4, the problem dates back to at least Guile 1.4. thanks for the bug report. i have started to clean up the 1.4.x branch (in cvs) as a result. the fo

Re: Fix for guile-www/cgi.scm (cgi:make-cookie)

From: Thamer Al-Harbash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:00:57 -0400 (EDT) If this patch works fine with the optargs module why not use it for the sake of simplicity? Does my patch break something? the "optargs module" has an interface and a name. its interface was chang

Re: Fix for guile-www/cgi.scm (cgi:make-cookie)

From: Thamer Al-Harbash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:53:34 -0400 (EDT) This cgi::make-cookie breaks under guile-1.6 because it's using a #&key and the (bound?) macro which seem to be no longer available or depreciated. Please accept my patch below which fixes the

Re: FW: problem compiling guile on IA64 by Intel compiler

Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 08:23:23 -0400 From: "Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> void __memory_barrier(void); Is this what is needed? i believe so. perhaps inhibition of only data-access instructions is not as strong as is necessary, but it's a start. code for 1.4.x

Re: FW: problem compiling guile on IA64 by Intel compiler

From: "Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:49:20 +0400 No, Intel compiler doesn't plan to support ia64 asm inlines in foreseeable future. looking at __scm.h closely, i see the inline asm is just an implementation detail of SCM_FENCE, but SCM_FENCE is

Re: FW: problem compiling guile on IA64 by Intel compiler

From: "Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 09:03:57 +0400 Starting from 8.0 Intel compiler defines GNUC macroses. that's very strange (IMHO). anyway, does the intel compiler have plans to support ia64 inline asm in the future? we would have to change the

Re: Autoconf macro GUILE_CHECK

From: Wolfgang Jaehrling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:30:25 +0100 made unambigous. In any case, _something_ is wrong here. :-) no worries, just figure out what is unambiguous and strive to emulate. i have seen in scripts: (exit #f). thi ___

Re: Antiquated (?) Gush fails to run

From: Michael Burschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:31:05 +0100 I downloaded the archive gush-0.0b.tar.gz from http://www.glug.org/people/ttn/software/gush/ and built it successfully. Whenever I try to run gush, however, I get the following error: Initializing

Re: virtual host support

From: "Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:50:39 -0300 In guile-www package: in http:request procedure, I am sending a patch to support virtual hosts retrieving. thanks for the patch. currently low-bandwidth, will probably take a look at it i

Re: Failing test from r4rstest.scm

From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 06 Jan 2003 19:55:26 + ... but it fails. Any idea why? what messages do you see? thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: Guile and readline on MacOS X

From: Aurelien Chanudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:06:02 +0100 Would anyone be interested in a patch ? if the patch is small, post it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks, thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/

Re: Updated [PATCH] Some fixes to doc/ref/scheme-data.texi

From: Stephen Compall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:48:53 -0600 Have done. /me foolishly overlooked (guile)Manual Conventions, and drew mental connection to "many typos of if."? :-S no worries. http://csserver.evansville.edu/~sc87/scheme-data-2S11.patch thanks. l

Re: [PATCH] Some fixes to doc/ref/scheme-data.texi

From: Stephen Compall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:11:41 -0500 2002-10-26 Stephen Compall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * scheme-data.texi: Addition and change of many Texinfo tags, particularly usage of @var and @samp, as well as reformatting of

Re: possible bug in srfi-19 implementation (fix included)

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:03:19 +0200 (define (mydatetoweeknumber dt) [...]) Is my solution acceptable? If not, is there anyone who can implement a better solution? looks like your solution codifies ISO-8601, but srfi-19 does not specify ISO-8601. if it i

Re: Guile 1.4.1 w/ guile-oops 1.0.2

From: Michael Carmack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 08:21:18 + Is guile-oops/1.0.2 not intended to be used with guile/1.4.1? more like guile-snarf invocation changing should be considered a bug, especially in light of 1.4.x goal of compatibility (mea culpa)! i've since

Re: open-output-pipe problem

From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 20:20:48 -0700 i have experimented w/ back-porting the new popen.scm (including associated support in libguile) w/o success [...] turns out i was laboring under the classic stupidity of forgetting to unpack

Re: Latest guile reports version "1.4" which appears to break guile-xlib3.0 configure

From: "David Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:53:32 -0700 I just downloaded what I thought was the latest version, which reports (version) as "1.4". The guile-xlib configure script checks for (string>= (version) "1.4.1") and then reports that my guile is too o

Re: open-output-pipe problem

From: Satoru Takabayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:56:57 +0900 I tried guile 1.4.1 and found a problem on open-output-pipe. hi, thanks for the bug report. i have reproduced the problem and noticed that it is gone in guile-HEAD, but have not yet figured out which of

Re: Guile Builds but Core dumps on 11.20

From: Stephanie Nile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:55:59 +0100 (BST) Unfortuantly the 11.20 version of guile coredumps. We are using gcc 3.0. Can you help? What info should I send about the build? We are using the same compile flags on both (11.00 and 11.20) sys

Re: MacOS X

From: richmit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:12:11 -0500 After struggling for a few hours I have finally managed to get guile to build on MacOS X. In order to do this, I had to remove readline from my development system -- I don't know how to get guile to build w

Re: [PATCH] lambda* fails with #:key and rest argument

From: Christopher Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:44:11 -0500 Index: ice-9/optargs.scm thanks for the patch. i've applied it for 1.4.2. thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listin

Re: guile-1.4.1: test failures under shared library, -O3

fyi, i've added this as: 1007-cc-optimizations-break-r4rs-test thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: (dynamic-link) ignores PREFIX/lib and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 14:13:42 -0400 So in a future version, this will Just Work? yes. to be fair, the 1.6.x and HEAD approach Just Works too (that is, for now, i'm not so sure about future robustness in the face of ambiguous interfaces and growing

Re: (dynamic-link) ignores PREFIX/lib and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:57:39 -0400 but it would still be nice if guile could tell libtool where to look for libguilereadline.la, since it's known to be in PREFIX/lib. yes. btw, another (smaller scope) fix would be to munge readline.scm `dynamic

Re: (dynamic-link) ignores PREFIX/lib and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:02:21 -0400 I have guile 1.4.1 installed in an unusual place, so PREFIX/lib isn't in the usual search path for shared libraries. It seems guile should always search PREFIX/lib, preferably before the systemwide directori

Re: inet_aton conflict

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 03:58:51 +0300 obvious enough. presuming you encountered this w/ guile-1.4, you should check out: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-1.4.1.tar.gz (it has this fix and other changes -- see NEWS). thi

Re: Segfault on setting file-position on sockets

From: Arno Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 16:43:21 +0200 The following 2 line snippet will segfault guile 1.4 (let ((sock (socket AF_INET SOCK_STREAM 0))) (file-set-position sock 0)) thanks. this is now recorded in the bugs db as: 1005-fse

Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review

From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100 No; the new way doesn't mutate at all. It creates a new environment that shares some substructure with the old environment. ok i see this now. But, does this test need a different execution environment? It's

Re: regexp-exec fails for long strings

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wolfgang_J=E4hrling?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:04:20 +0200 AFAIK, the glibc-people are rewriting the regex code for 2.3, because the current implementation got unmaintainable and has various strange limitations. This could be one of those.

Re: regexp-exec fails for long strings

From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:29:40 -0700 i traced this to `regexec' (glibc 2.2.4) and stopped -- it's not a guile bug after all, as far as i could tell. (also, could not reproduce the behavior under FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE.)

Re: RedHat-7.3 & gcc-2.95.3.2

thanks for the report. this will be fixed along w/ some other things in guile 1.4.1 release -- see guile web pages for details on how to get a cvs checkout (cvs module "hack"). i am curious: what is your use for guile? thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list

Re: Compilation fix for guile 1.4

From: Davide Angelocola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 13:18:23 +0200 I've downloaded guile version 1.4 to learn on how to program in C under UNIX. However, when I try to compile it on my RedHat 7.2 machine I get an error in net_db.c line 85. Well, I've just put a

install-data-local scheduling not guaranteed

in branch_release-1-6 ice-9/Makefile.am, we use `install-data-local' to install "and-let*.scm". w/ automake 1.5 (no idea what was before), this frag is run before the rest of the install, and fails if there is no destination directory already set up. the failure is masked by the "-" action prefi

Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review

From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 02 May 2002 13:59:06 +0100 - SCM_SETCAR (SCM_CAR (env), scm_cons (n, SCM_CAR (SCM_CAR (env; The copy in scm_unmemocopy, which looks as though it might be intended to fix this problem [...] was this used previously? (i'm trying

Re: regexp-exec fails for long strings

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 23:47:13 +0200 | guile> (test ok) | string-length 42 => ok | guile> (test (+space ok 11672)) | string-length 11714 => ok | guile> (test (+space ok 11673)) | string-length 11715 => ok | guile> (test (+spa

regexp-exec fails for long strings

well, good and bad news. the good news is that another guile project was recently added to the projects list. the bad news is that for www.gnu.org, template.scm now fails due to unfulfilled regexp matching. (this has resulted in an empty project page there.) below is a test case that demonstra

Re: guile-snarf writes to $srcdir, which is not kosher

From: Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:09:04 -0500 Furthermore, as I've said several times before, this should give you a clue that saying things on mailing lists isn't as useful to other people understanding you, as writing them down somewhere under workbook/

Re: guile-snarf writes to $srcdir, which is not kosher

From: Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:42:58 -0500 Depends on the problem. For example, the recent library name changes relating to libltdl/dlopen issues may or may not belong in HEAD, but they're critical for 1.6. the recent changes may or may not belon

Re: guile-snarf writes to $srcdir, which is not kosher

From: Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:10:56 -0500 I've been trying to make sure to migrate all my 1.6 patches to HEAD, but there are still some outstanding. Of course some of the lag is because I'm not sure we'll want to handle things the same in 1.8. h

Re: Guile 1.5.6 build failure on OpenBSD 3.0

From: "Dale P. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:11:39 -0400 It appears that the preprocessor #define i386 isn't defined, while __i386__ is. Using __i386__ seems to fix things. Here is a diff: thanks for the patch. before being applied, a few questions: is this

Re: guile-snarf writes to $srcdir, which is not kosher

From: Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 09 Apr 2002 19:03:29 +0200 I'm totally open as to what will happen for 1.8, so I didn't change it there as well. ok, noted in TODO. thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mai

Re: guile-snarf writes to $srcdir, which is not kosher

From: Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Apr 2002 18:45:44 +0200 A VPATH build is when you compile in a directory other than the source directory. This is useful when you want to compile a package for different configurations but from a common source. The name stems f

Re: guile-snarf writes to $srcdir, which is not kosher

From: Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Apr 2002 00:55:38 +0200 Sigh, I've seen this coming... guile-snarf writes its $cleanfile into the $srcdir, which is not a supported thing to do during a VPATH build. looks like some coding cowboy should've figured out what kind of

Re: Badness with TODO at dist time

From: Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Apr 2002 00:22:35 +0200 (One tempting thing is to not distribute TODO at all.) i wouldn't mind if we didn't distribute TODO. thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gn

Re: Guile fails tests on Tru64 4.0F

From: David C Sterratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:55:24 +0100 $ ./autogen.sh . aclocal: configure.in: 167: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library I'm using autoconf version 2.53 and automake 1.4p5 Should I be using different versions? Or is there some

Re: unhandled keywords to goops "make" should signal errors

From: "Neil W. Van Dyke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 02:00:06 -0500 If I understand Bug 11 correctly, then it appears to be a very different problem than the one I report. what you request for consideration must surely have been considered before. if we figure out pre

Re: unhandled keywords to goops "make" should signal errors

From: "Neil W. Van Dyke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:10:54 -0500 Thank you for considering this suggestion. could this be related to: http://www.glug.org/snap/bugs/guile-core/11.html ? thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL

Re: bug 9 -- sibling threads not infinite looping

From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Mar 2002 17:57:57 + - `guile -s bug9.scm' outputs about 15 `a's and `b's, and then stops, as the main thread has exited - `guile -l bug9.scm' continues outputting `a's and `b's forever, and also performs normal REPL interac

Re: cvs guile build/install problems

From: Lynn Winebarger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:24:07 -0500 The documentation is a little vague on the library paths - that is, whether "library" refers to a library of scheme code, a compiled library, or both [ which may vary from context to context in the d

  1   2   >