From: "Neil W. Van Dyke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 02:00:06 -0500
If I understand Bug 11 correctly, then it appears to be a very different problem than the one I report. what you request for consideration must surely have been considered before. if we figure out precisely how it is different and how it is the same, perhaps we can apply that understanding. because my personal coding has not yet advanced to using goops regularly, my conjecture from reading related material is that keyword handling in goops follows a non-blocking scheme reflecting its original design model. i imagine when i do finally get to designing classes and instantiating objects, i would view mixin techniques darkly if they were (in return) so opaque. perhaps i misunderstand the nature of keywords in goops and compare it against other keyword disciplines, fruitlessly. how would i tell? goops can be extended to do such error checking, in any case. thi _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
