[bug #66419] [libgroff] seems like fix for bug 61424 was too aggressive

Follow-up Comment #14, bug #66419 (group groff): [comment #9 comment #9:] > If you'd like to propose its reconsideration, please post a > comment to bug #61424 so that the other _groff_ developers who > opined on it (Dave Kemper and Deri James) are aware of your > perspective and can weigh in. I

[bug #66429] [grog] noisy when overriding inferred main package

URL: Summary: [grog] noisy when overriding inferred main package Group: GNU roff Submitter: gbranden Submitted: Fri 08 Nov 2024 03:22:39 PM UTC Category: Utilities

[bug #66419] [libgroff] seems like fix for bug 61424 was too aggressive

Follow-up Comment #12, bug #66419 (group groff): [comment #8 comment #8:] > $ git diff > diff --git a/font/devps/download b/font/devps/download > index 3f77716b6..62d3c012b 100644 > --- a/font/devps/download > +++ b/font/devps/download > @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ > # PostScript-name Filename > > Symb

[bug #66419] [libgroff] seems like fix for bug 61424 was too aggressive

Follow-up Comment #13, bug #66419 (group groff): Hi Deri, [comment #12 comment #12:] > I am confused now! The ticket is about the restriction of including a path in > the download file, It's actually about several things, in my view, which I think is the only thing confusing you. > which you s