Follow-up Comment #14, bug #66419 (group groff): [comment #9 comment #9:] > If you'd like to propose its reconsideration, please post a > comment to bug #61424 so that the other _groff_ developers who > opined on it (Dave Kemper and Deri James) are aware of your > perspective and can weigh in.
I'm following this one too. FWIW, I never expressed (and still don't have) a
strong opinion about 61424. My only comments there were about the conditions
under which I could reproduce it. (The mystery in my last 61424 comment, to
my knowledge, remains unsolved. But I doubt it has any bearing here.)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66419>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
