Update of bug #63354 (project groff):
Depends on: => bugs #63332
___
Follow-up Comment #32:
[comment #31 comment #31:]
> In starting to work on these patches, I realized I had already made
Update of bug #64624 (project groff):
Category: Driver grotty => Preprocessor pic
Item Group: Rendering/Cosmetics => Incorrect behaviour
Status:None => Confirmed
Summary: [gr
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #64624 (project groff):
[comment #9 comment #9:]
> Apart from the semantics of "fill color" being different for _nroff_
> devices, I don't think this report has much to do with _grotty_.
I suppose the underlying question is whether nroff's "fill color" semantics
make se
Update of bug #64624 (project groff):
Status: Confirmed => Need Info
Assigned to:None => gbranden
___
Follow-up Comment #11:
[comment #10 comment
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #64624 (project groff):
[comment #11 comment #11:]
> ...it seems to me fairly harmless.
...the "fairly" carving out an exception for at least this bug and bug
#61455.
But it was a deliberate implementation decision that I see has been around for
over 20 years ([http://
Update of bug #61455 (project groff):
Severity: 2 - Minor => 3 - Normal
Item Group: Rendering/Cosmetics => Incorrect behaviour
Status:None => Duplicate
Assigned to:
Follow-up Comment #13, bug #64624 (project groff):
[comment #12 comment #12:]
> [comment #11 comment #11:]
> > ...it seems to me fairly harmless.
>
> ...the "fairly" carving out an exception for at least this bug and bug
#61455.
These tickets appear to be bosons rather than fermions, so no addi
