Re: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Problem with getopt on CentOS 5.8

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Egli
Hi Eric Thanks for your answer Eric Blake writes: > On 01/04/2013 07:58 AM, Christian Egli wrote: >> We have a developer on CentOS 5.8 who can no longer compile. Make fails >> in getopt.h with the following error message: >> >>> In file included from /usr/include/unistd.h:837, >>>

gnupload ??

2013-01-07 Thread Bruce Korb
$ ../gnulib/build-aux/gnupload --to ftp.gnu.org:sharutils sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz ../gnulib/build-aux/gnupload: Reading configuration file .gnuploadrc Enter GPG passphrase: Signing sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz ... Uploading sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz to ftp.gnu.org:sharutils ... sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz:

Re: gnupload ??

2013-01-07 Thread Bruce Korb
I give up. I don't understand the messages. I got these same messages yesterday and the xz file did not show up. I tried it again today, and I believed these messages. I also just now got confirmation that the files are there and I checked. They are there. Beats heck out of me. On 01/07/13 05:3

RE: bug#13347: stat/fstat inappropriately used in cp, install, rm, sort, chown for Windows 7 platforms

2013-01-07 Thread Burkhardt, Glenn UTAS
> -Original Message- > From: Eli Zaretskii [mailto:e...@gnu.org] > Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 11:54 AM > To: Eric Blake > Cc: Burkhardt, Glenn UTAS; bug-gnulib@gnu.org; 13...@debbugs.gnu.org > Subject: Re: bug#13347: stat/fstat inappropriately used in cp, install, rm, > sort, > chown

Re: gnupload ??

2013-01-07 Thread Karl Berry
> Uploading sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz to ftp.gnu.org:sharutils ... > sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz: 939.65 kB 76.84 kB/s ... > Uploading sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz to ftp.gnu.org:sharutils ... > ncftpput sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz: server said: Could not creat

Re: gnupload ??

2013-01-07 Thread Bruce Korb
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > > Uploading sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz to ftp.gnu.org:sharutils ... > > sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz: 939.65 kB > 76.84 kB/s > ... > > Uploading sharutils-4.13.3.tar.xz to ftp.gnu.org:sharutils ... > >

Re: [PATCH] Use malloca instead alloca

2013-01-07 Thread Roland McGrath
Paul's points are valid as a generic thing. But they aren't the key points for considering changes to libc. The entire discussion about maximum usable size is unnecessary fritter. We already have __libc_use_alloca, alloca_account, etc. (include/alloca.h) to govern that decision for libc code. If