Hello,
Building a gnulib snapshot containing all modules & tests fails on
Solaris 2.6 & 7.
For Solaris 2.6 only I'm seeing errors like this:
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DEXEEXT=\"\" -DEXEEXT=\"\"
-DNO_XMALLOC -DEXEEXT=\"\" -I. -I.. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1
-I../intl -I/
usr/tg
I pushed this:
---
ChangeLog | 7 +++
doc/parse-datetime.texi | 33 ++---
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 4af58eb..0e31877 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2013-01-0
On 01/06/2013 07:11 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> For Solaris 2.6 only I'm seeing errors like this:
> gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DEXEEXT=\"\" -DEXEEXT=\"\"
> -DNO_XMALLOC -DEXEEXT=\"\" -I. -I.. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1 -I../intl -I/
> usr/tgcware/include -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -MT
On 01/06/2013 04:47 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 01/06/2013 07:11 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
For Solaris 2.6 only I'm seeing errors like this:
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DEXEEXT=\"\" -DEXEEXT=\"\" -DNO_XMALLOC
-DEXEEXT=\"\" -I. -I.. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1 -I../intl -I/
usr/tg
The automated script missed this one.
* doc/gnulib.texi: Update copyright date.
---
ChangeLog | 3 +++
doc/gnulib.texi | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 0e31877..2d4793d 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
2
> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:38:47 -0700
> From: Eric Blake
> Cc: Bug-gnulib , 13...@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > But then it gets interesting. The 'cp' command is built with a different
> > version of 'stat' and 'fstat' than one normally gets with a MinGW build
> > environment. The coreutils need the
On 01/06/2013 04:50 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
The automated script missed this one.
* doc/gnulib.texi: Update copyright date.
---
ChangeLog | 3 +++
doc/gnulib.texi | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 0e31877..2d4793d 100644
--
On 01/06/2013 09:58 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Does the -- indicate that, some years it wasn't updated?
No, it just means an en dash, which looks nicer when printed.
http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/texinfo.html#index-En-dash_002c-producing-61
> Changing to a single - should en
Paul Eggert writes:
> We should alter gnulib-tool to not indent that line,
> in the short term. In the longer term autopoint should be fixed
> to work even if the AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION line is indented,
> so I'll CC: this message to bug-gnu-gettext.
>
> By the way, I'm puzzled that this problem
On 01/06/2013 08:36 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> I assume you mean the preprocessed source?
Yes, that's right. I took a quick look at the preprocessed
output but it's not obvious what the problem is. The new problem
you found looks like it may be something that AC_HEADER_TIME
might fix. But
10 matches
Mail list logo