On 8 June 2012 11:19, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I've heard such rants as well. The rants are IMO, misdirected. For instance,
> IIRC, gnulib's freadahead use is caused by musl's printf not being posix
> compliant, causing gnulib to pull in its printf replacement, which doesn't
> work
> on musl. A li
On 06/07/2012 12:14 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Someone just wrote a rant in a bug report for a program I maintain
> about gnulib being the cause of many portability problems. I tracked
> it down to the points raised here:
>
> http://www.etalabs.net/musl/faq.html
>
> Have you any plans to address
> Maybe you missed this one.
Hi Akim,
Indeed I did. I marked it as "read", thinking that thread was done.
Please get in the habit of using a new subject for each patch.
Akim Demaille wrote:
> This time, it's gnu-web-doc-update. I can't fully test it
> now, as I had not defined manual_title in v2.5.1 :(
>
> From bc0749a1d9c7d8b05bbe49d45205a2e5576678bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Akim Demaille
> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:17:36 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu-web
Hi!
Le 8 juin 2012 à 14:20, Jim Meyering a écrit :
> One question:
>
> ...
>> @@ -89,15 +110,23 @@ trap 'exit $?' 1 2 13 15
>> # We must build using sources for which --version reports the
>> # just-released version number, not some string like 7.6.18-20761.
>> # That version string propagates i
This gets included by NTP and they need a more liberal license:
From d9adda99d471074850b3563fad18fd1837397ca8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bruce Korb
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:17:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] parse-duration: Lessen the GPL
* lib/parse-duration.c: mark the license as "Lesser"
* lib
On 06/08/2012 02:20 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> This gets included by NTP and they need a more liberal license:
>
> lib/parse-duration.c | 14 +++---
> lib/parse-duration.h |8
These hunks are not needed. We prefer to leave 'lib' at the latest
license, and it is your use
On 06/08/2012 01:38 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> ased on 'git log', it looks like you need
> consent from Paul,
My contributions were trivial but for what it's worth it's OK
with me to relicense this under the LGPL.
On 06/08/12 13:38, Eric Blake wrote:
modules/parse-duration |2 +-
This hunk is sufficient, but only if we either have agreement from all
non-trivial contributors on making the change to the license, or
permission from the FSF. Based on 'git log', it looks like you need
consent from Paul,
